Yang Juhyeon, Park Bohyun
Department of Nursing, Kaya University, 208 Samgye-Ro, Gimhae-Si, Gyeongsangnam-Do, 50830, Republic of Korea.
Department of Nursing, Changwon National University, 20, Changwondaehak-Ro, Uichang-gu, Changwon-Si, Gyeongsangnam-do, 51140, Republic of Korea.
BMC Public Health. 2025 Jul 2;25(1):2231. doi: 10.1186/s12889-025-23431-7.
This study aimed to evaluate the effects of a health promotion program developed using Community-Based Participatory Research (CBPR) for older adults at risk for developing metabolic syndrome in rural areas of South korea.
The methodology of this study is a mixed method using embedded design. A non-random controlled trial (28 in the experimental group and 36 in the control group) for the quantitative study and a qualitative content analysis for the qualitative study were used.
After the health promotion program, health promotion behavior (exercise and physical activity, cognitive maintenance function, positive acceptance) and physiological indicators related to metabolic syndrome (fast blood sugar, triglyceride, and body mass index) were significantly improved. At the intrapersonal level, positive changes regarding participants' bodies, daily life, and emotional satisfaction were noted. At the interpersonal level, participants' social support and sense of community improved.
This health promotion program was based on the Social Ecological Model and was developed using CBPR. Changes in some indicators at the individual and interpersonal levels were identified through the quantitative study, while specific changes at the individual, interpersonal, and community levels were identified in the qualitative study. Manuals and an assessment tool must be developed to encourage wider use of CBPR.
本研究旨在评估一项采用社区参与式研究(CBPR)开发的健康促进项目对韩国农村地区有患代谢综合征风险的老年人的影响。
本研究采用嵌入设计的混合方法。定量研究采用非随机对照试验(实验组28人,对照组36人),定性研究采用定性内容分析。
健康促进项目实施后,健康促进行为(运动与身体活动、认知维持功能、积极接纳)以及与代谢综合征相关的生理指标(空腹血糖、甘油三酯和体重指数)均有显著改善。在个人层面,参与者在身体、日常生活和情感满意度方面有积极变化。在人际层面,参与者的社会支持和社区归属感得到改善。
该健康促进项目基于社会生态模型,采用CBPR开发。通过定量研究确定了个人和人际层面一些指标的变化,而定性研究则确定了个人、人际和社区层面的具体变化。必须开发手册和评估工具,以鼓励更广泛地使用CBPR。