Elg Mattias, Wihlborg Elin, Wiger Malin
Division of Logistics and Quality Management, Department of Management and Engineering, Linköping University, 581 83, Linköping, Sweden.
Division of Policy Sciences, Department of Management and Engineering, Linköping University, 581 83, Linköping, Sweden.
BMC Health Serv Res. 2025 Jul 7;25(1):938. doi: 10.1186/s12913-025-13068-y.
There is a growing need for new knowledge about healthcare policy implementation that is relevant to both researchers and practitioners. Many policy initiatives fail due to insufficient coordination between different system levels and conflicting agendas among various actors. This paper aims to propose and illustrate an analytical framework using a multilevel-multilogic framework. This framework helps reveal the combined challenges encountered when implementing policies within public healthcare systems.
A multiple case study was conducted, focusing on the implementation of disease prevention guidelines in four Swedish healthcare regions. These regions were purposefully selected to represent diverse contexts and conditions that could influence policy translation. A total of 28 respondents across the four regions were interviewed, representing different system levels and institutional logics. The qualitative analysis identified connections between actors, settings, and policies, and explored how policy translation varied-from strong to weak, or even interrupted-as it moved from policy development to clinical practice.
We developed a theoretical and empirical understanding of policy translation processes, tracking how evidence-based national guidelines for disease prevention methods (DPMs) moved through regional administrative systems into clinical practice. The analysis focused on four main themes: the gradual translation and reinterpretation of policy objectives, the impact of shifting policy priorities, the facilitating role of technology in translation processes, and the ways policy became embedded into everyday clinical routines.
Policy guidelines are implemented through a stepwise translation process, first being adopted and adapted within healthcare administrative systems via political and administrative activities, and then integrated into clinical practice. Within the multilevel-multilogic framework, each system level or logic has the potential to adapt, alter, delay, or even block the intended policy. Actions taken early in the translation process significantly affect the outcomes of subsequent stages.
对于与研究人员和从业者都相关的医疗保健政策实施新知识的需求日益增长。由于不同系统层面之间协调不足以及各行为主体之间议程冲突,许多政策倡议都失败了。本文旨在提出并阐释一个使用多层次 - 多逻辑框架的分析框架。该框架有助于揭示在公共医疗系统中实施政策时遇到的综合挑战。
开展了一项多案例研究,重点关注瑞典四个医疗保健地区疾病预防指南的实施情况。这些地区是经过特意挑选的,以代表可能影响政策转化的不同背景和条件。对四个地区的总共28名受访者进行了访谈,他们代表了不同的系统层面和制度逻辑。定性分析确定了行为主体、环境和政策之间的联系,并探讨了政策从制定到临床实践过程中政策转化是如何变化的——从强到弱,甚至中断。
我们对政策转化过程形成了理论和实证理解,追踪基于证据的国家疾病预防方法指南是如何通过地区行政系统进入临床实践的。分析聚焦于四个主要主题:政策目标的逐步转化和重新解释、政策重点转移的影响、技术在转化过程中的促进作用以及政策融入日常临床常规的方式。
政策指南是通过一个逐步转化的过程来实施的,首先在医疗保健行政系统内通过政治和行政活动被采纳和调整,然后融入临床实践。在多层次 - 多逻辑框架内,每个系统层面或逻辑都有可能调整、改变、延迟甚至阻碍预期政策。在转化过程早期采取的行动会显著影响后续阶段的结果。