McCoy Luke, Markert Ronald, Thoms Elysha, Noall Olivia, Burtson Kathryn
Department of Medicine, Wright State University, Dayton, Ohio, United States of America.
Case Western/Metro Health Medical Center, Cleveland, United States of America.
PLoS One. 2025 Jul 8;20(7):e0327655. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0327655. eCollection 2025.
The flipped classroom (FC) model is increasingly used in undergraduate medical education, where it has been associated with improved knowledge acquisition. However, its impact on graduate medical education (GME) remains underexplored. We hypothesized that implementing a flipped didactics curriculum in our internal medicine residency program would improve performance on the Internal Medicine In-Training Examination (IM-ITE) and the American Board of Internal Medicine Certifying Examination (IM-CE).
In 2017, we transitioned from a traditional lecture-based (LB) curriculum to a flipped model. Noon conferences were replaced with problem-based learning (PBL) sessions three days per week, with additional active learning formats used on the remaining days. Morning reports were redesigned to deliver foundational content in advance of PBL sessions. The curriculum followed a 13-block annual structure aligned with ABIM content areas. We compared IM-ITE and IM-CE scores of residents who completed the full flipped curriculum to those trained under the prior LB model.
We analyzed data from 279 residents who completed or were expected to complete training between 2014 and 2024. FC curriculum residents scored significantly higher on all three IM-ITE exams: ITE1 (62.39% vs. 59.53%, p = 0.008), ITE2 (69.78% vs. 66.54%, p = 0.002), and ITE3 (73.42% vs. 71.12%, p = 0.029). IM-CE scores did not significantly differ between groups (FC = 496 vs. LB = 481, p = 0.32). The first-attempt IM-CE pass rate was significantly higher among FC residents (95.5% vs. 84.0%, p = 0.012).
Residents in the flipped classroom curriculum demonstrated significantly higher IM-ITE scores and first-attempt pass rates on IM-CE compared to those in the lecture-based curriculum. These outcomes were associated with medium effect sizes, suggesting a meaningful educational benefit of the flipped classroom approach in graduate medical education.
翻转课堂(FC)模式在本科医学教育中的应用日益广泛,且与知识获取的改善相关。然而,其对毕业后医学教育(GME)的影响仍未得到充分探索。我们假设在我们的内科住院医师培训项目中实施翻转式教学课程将提高内科住院医师培训考试(IM-ITE)和美国内科医学委员会认证考试(IM-CE)的成绩。
2017年,我们从传统的以讲座为基础的(LB)课程过渡到翻转模式。每周三天的午间会议被基于问题的学习(PBL)课程取代,其余时间采用额外的主动学习形式。晨间报告被重新设计,以便在PBL课程之前提供基础内容。该课程遵循与美国内科医学委员会(ABIM)内容领域一致的每年13个模块的结构。我们将完成完整翻转课程的住院医师的IM-ITE和IM-CE成绩与之前LB模式下培训的住院医师的成绩进行了比较。
我们分析了2014年至2024年间完成或预计完成培训的279名住院医师的数据。FC课程的住院医师在所有三次IM-ITE考试中的得分均显著更高:ITE1(62.39%对59.53%,p = 0.008)、ITE2(69.78%对66.54%,p = 0.002)和ITE3(73.42%对71.12%,p = 0.02)。两组之间的IM-CE成绩没有显著差异(FC = 496对LB = 481,p = 0.32)。FC住院医师首次尝试的IM-CE通过率显著更高(95.5%对84.0%,p = 0.012)。
与基于讲座的课程相比,翻转课堂课程的住院医师在IM-ITE成绩和IM-CE首次尝试通过率方面显著更高。这些结果与中等效应量相关,表明翻转课堂方法在毕业后医学教育中具有有意义的教育益处。