Callaghan Caitlin M, Johnson Christopher A, Biswas Piyashi, See Jill, Dodakian Lucy, Chan Vicky, Wang Po T, Cramer Steven C, Nenadic Zoran, Do An H, Reinkensmeyer David J
IEEE Int Conf Rehabil Robot. 2025 May;2025:1347-1352. doi: 10.1109/ICORR66766.2025.11063155.
The interplay between proprioceptive and cognitive impairment following stroke is not well understood, along with the implications it may have on the design of robotic proprioception assessments. To examine the relationship between proprioceptive and cognitive impairments, we used a robotic device to measure ankle proprioception in 37 chronic stroke patients. Participants also completed the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) and NIH stroke scale (NIHSS). We found that overall MoCA score was correlated with both active ($\mathrm{R}{\mathrm{s}}=-0.32 \mathrm{p}=0.034$) and passive proprioception ability ($\mathrm{R}{\mathrm{s}}=-0.52, \mathrm{p}=0.01$). When we examined the MoCA subscores, we found that the Visuospatial/Executive subscore was moderately correlated with measures of both active ($R_{s}=-0.57$, $\mathrm{p}=0$) and passive ($\mathrm{R}{\mathrm{s}}=-0.42, \mathrm{p}=0.01$) ankle proprioception ability. When we removed 5 individuals who were identified as having unilateral neglect using the NIHSS, the correlations remained significant. The Attention subtest was also weakly correlated with active proprioception ability ($\mathrm{R}{\mathrm{s}}=-0.36, \mathrm{p}=0.03$). Thus, proprioception ability is interrelated with specific cognitive impairments after stroke besides neglect. This suggests that cognitive tests should be conducted alongside robotic proprioceptive tests after stroke, to identify where cognitive factors may be contributing to measured proprioceptive error.
中风后本体感觉与认知障碍之间的相互作用尚未得到充分理解,其对机器人本体感觉评估设计的影响也不明确。为了研究本体感觉与认知障碍之间的关系,我们使用机器人设备对37名慢性中风患者的踝关节本体感觉进行了测量。参与者还完成了蒙特利尔认知评估量表(MoCA)和美国国立卫生研究院卒中量表(NIHSS)。我们发现,MoCA总分与主动(Rs = -0.32,p = 0.034)和被动本体感觉能力(Rs = -0.52,p = 0.01)均相关。当我们检查MoCA子分数时,发现视觉空间/执行功能子分数与主动(Rs = -0.57,p = 0)和被动(Rs = -0.42,p = 0.01)踝关节本体感觉能力测量值均呈中度相关。当我们剔除使用NIHSS被确定为有单侧忽视的5名个体后,相关性仍然显著。注意力子测试也与主动本体感觉能力呈弱相关(Rs = -0.36,p = 0.03)。因此,除了忽视之外,中风后的本体感觉能力还与特定的认知障碍相关。这表明中风后在进行机器人本体感觉测试的同时应进行认知测试,以确定认知因素可能在何处导致所测量的本体感觉误差。