Park Geun-Ho, Park Sehhoon, Kim Hyemin, Jung Hyun-Ae, Sun Jong-Mu, Ahn Jin Seok, Ahn Myung-Ju, Lee Se-Hoon
Department of Health Sciences and Technology, Samsung Advanced Institute for Health Science & Technology (SAIHST), Sungkyunkwan University, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Division of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Division of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Eur J Cancer. 2025 Aug 26;226:115631. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2025.115631. Epub 2025 Jul 10.
There has been little investigation of predictive biomarkers and resistance mechanisms of amivantamab, an EGFR, and MET targeting bispecific antibody in EGFR ex20ins. Here, we investigated the correlation of molecular profile with clinical outcome using cell-free NGS (cf-NGS) in patients treated with amivantamab.
Plasma samples from PCR or NGS-confirmed EGFR ex20ins patients (n = 30) treated with amivantamab were prospectively and longitudinally collected for analysis. The Guardant OMNI research-use-only assay was used for molecular profiling.
cfNGS analysis was performed on 62 samples from 25 patients. Baseline cfDNA-based NGS results demonstrated that patients with an EGFR ex20ins variant allele frequency (VAF) < 1 % (n = 11) showed higher objective response rate (45.4 vs 35.7 %), durable clinical benefit ratio (81.8 vs 21.4 %), and longer progression-free survival (PFS) (16.5 vs 2.6 months, hazard ratio [HR] 0.40, p < 0.01) compared to those with VAF ≥ 1 % (n = 14). The most common concurrent alteration was TP53 (n = 14, 56.0 %) which showed no correlation with clinical outcome while concomitant EGFR amplification (n = 9, 36.0 %) showed significantly shorter PFS (11.1 vs 2.7 months, HR 0.35, p < 0.05). Paired analysis showed a significant difference in PFS based on the dynamics of EGFR ex20ins VAF compared to the baseline and during treatment. Additionally, we identified several acquired resistance mechanisms to amivantamab.
Our findings underscore the significant predictive value of baseline EGFR ex20ins VAF for amivantamab treatment. Furthermore, changes in ctDNA VAF during treatment emphasize the role of early ctDNA dynamics as critical predictors of therapeutic response and long-term outcomes, which may inform treatment strategies.
对于埃万妥单抗(一种靶向表皮生长因子受体(EGFR)和间质-上皮转化因子(MET)的双特异性抗体)在EGFR外显子20插入突变中的预测生物标志物和耐药机制,目前研究较少。在此,我们使用无细胞下一代测序(cf-NGS)研究了接受埃万妥单抗治疗患者的分子特征与临床结局之间的相关性。
前瞻性、纵向收集接受埃万妥单抗治疗的经聚合酶链反应(PCR)或NGS确认的EGFR外显子20插入突变患者(n = 30)的血浆样本进行分析。使用Guardant OMNI仅供研究使用的检测方法进行分子特征分析。
对25例患者的62份样本进行了cfNGS分析。基于基线无细胞DNA的NGS结果显示,EGFR外显子20插入突变等位基因频率(VAF)<1%的患者(n = 11)与VAF≥1%的患者(n = 14)相比,客观缓解率更高(45.4%对35.7%)、持久临床获益率更高(81.8%对21.4%)以及无进展生存期(PFS)更长(16.5个月对2.6个月,风险比[HR] 0.40,p < 0.01)。最常见的同时发生的改变是TP53(n = 14,56.0%),其与临床结局无相关性,而同时存在的EGFR扩增(n = 9,36.0%)显示PFS显著缩短(11.1个月对2.7个月,HR 0.35,p < 0.05)。配对分析显示,基于EGFR外显子20插入突变VAF相对于基线和治疗期间的动态变化,PFS存在显著差异。此外,我们还确定了几种对埃万妥单抗的获得性耐药机制。
我们的研究结果强调了基线EGFR外显子20插入突变VAF对埃万妥单抗治疗的显著预测价值。此外,治疗期间循环肿瘤DNA(ctDNA)VAF的变化强调了早期ctDNA动态变化作为治疗反应和长期结局关键预测指标的作用,这可能为治疗策略提供参考。