Nishad Geeta, Rahane Shripriya, Jaipuriar Nivedita, Bhagat Poonam, Thakur Suyash, Ahmed Syed Owais
Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Triveni Institute of Dental Sciences, Hospital and Research Centre, Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh, India.
Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Rajesh Ramdasji Kambe Dental College and Hospital, Akola, Maharashtra, India.
J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2025 Jun;17(Suppl 2):S1634-S1636. doi: 10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_200_25. Epub 2025 Jun 18.
The success of restorative materials in Class V lesions depends significantly on their adhesive properties. The objective was to assess the shear bond strength of Zirconomer, Giomer, Cention-N, and ChemFil Superior as restorative materials in Class-V lesions.
The following restoration methods were used for the forty removed maxillary central incisor teeth ( = 10): Centri-N, Zirconomer, Giomer, and ChemFil Superior Glass Ionomer Cement. There was thermocycling. The universal testing m shear bond strength analysis was used for all of the specimens. A one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Tukey's post hoc test were used for statistical analysis. A value below 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Cention-N had the highest shear bond strength, according to the results. Chemfil had the poorest performance.
Cention N had the highest shear bond strength when compared to Zirconomer, Giomer, and ChemFil Superior Glass Ionomer Cement.