Suppr超能文献

精英网球中不同比赛风格以及胜负比赛之间的外部训练负荷与主观用力感觉比较

External training load and rating of perceived exertion comparison between different playing styles and winning vs. losing matches in elite tennis.

作者信息

Tóth Péter János, Csáki István, Négyesi János, Dobos Károly, Havanecz Krisztián, Sáfár Sándor, Ökrös Csaba

机构信息

Department of Sport Games, Hungarian University of Sports Science, Budapest, Hungary.

School of Doctoral Studies, Hungarian University of Sports Science, Budapest, Hungary.

出版信息

Front Sports Act Living. 2025 Jul 1;7:1613661. doi: 10.3389/fspor.2025.1613661. eCollection 2025.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

This study aims to compare different playing styles on external training load and rating of perceived exertion (RPE) in elite Hungarian junior tennis players during the off-season in winning vs. losing matches.

METHODS

Sixteen elite male junior tennis players from the same club participated in this study (aggressive baseliner:  = 9; counterpuncher:  = 7), and each player was required to play three simulated matches. We measured eleven activity profiles, fourteen external training load variables, and the subjective RPE parameter for all matches. For the activity profile measure, we used video cameras, and for the external training load, we used a 10 Hz global navigation satellite system (GNSS) with integrated 100 Hz inertial measurement units (IMU).

RESULTS

For the different playing styles, we found that aggressive baseliner players produce more high-intensity (≤-2 m/s) decelerations ( = 0.015;  = 0.35), and higher other stroke load values ( = 0.009;  = 0.38), than counterpuncher players. However, in the other external training load and RPE variables we did not find any significance differences ( > 0.05). For the match outcomes, we found that the running load ( = 0.013;  = 0.50) values were higher in winning situations, while the RPE ( = 0.000;  = 0.79) values were greater in losing matches. However, apart from this, we did not find any significant differences in the other parameters ( > 0.05).

DISCUSSION

In conclusion, aggressive baseliner players must develop more movements toward the net and the necessary adjustment steps for volleys. Furthermore, running activities do not necessarily influence match outcomes, therefore, it is important to place more emphasis on the development and monitoring of technical and tactical situations. Based on these points, we recommend that coaches integrate the development of specific footwork and dominant technical-tactical actions simultaneously on the court, so that players can better incorporate these elements into their game.

摘要

引言

本研究旨在比较匈牙利精英青少年网球运动员在非赛季中,获胜与失利比赛里不同比赛风格对外部训练负荷和主观用力感觉(RPE)的影响。

方法

来自同一俱乐部的16名精英男性青少年网球运动员参与了本研究(积极底线型:9人;反击型:7人),每位运动员需进行三场模拟比赛。我们测量了所有比赛的11种活动概况、14个外部训练负荷变量以及主观RPE参数。对于活动概况测量,我们使用了摄像机;对于外部训练负荷,我们使用了集成100Hz惯性测量单元(IMU)的10Hz全球导航卫星系统(GNSS)。

结果

对于不同的比赛风格,我们发现积极底线型球员比反击型球员产生更多的高强度(≤ -2m/s)减速(P = 0.015;η² = 0.35),以及更高的其他击球负荷值(P = 0.009;η² = 0.38)。然而,在其他外部训练负荷和RPE变量中,我们未发现任何显著差异(P > 0.05)。对于比赛结果,我们发现获胜情况下的跑步负荷(P = 0.013;η² = 0.50)值更高,而失利比赛中的RPE(P = 0.000;η² = 0.79)值更大。然而除此之外,我们在其他参数中未发现任何显著差异(P > 0.05)。

讨论

总之,积极底线型球员必须更多地向网前移动并发展截击所需的调整步伐。此外,跑步活动不一定会影响比赛结果,因此,更重要的是要注重技术和战术情况的发展与监测。基于这些要点,我们建议教练在球场上同时整合特定步法的发展和主导技术战术动作,以便球员能更好地将这些元素融入比赛。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验