Chauhan Pooja, Babu P Jaya Krishna, Sunkara Lokesh, Rathore Kiran, Kumar Vimal
Department of Prosthodontics, Army College of Dental Sciences, Secunderabad, Telangana, India.
J Indian Prosthodont Soc. 2025 Jul 1;25(3):198-203. doi: 10.4103/jips.jips_396_24. Epub 2025 Jul 16.
This study delves into how different printing orientations following polishing and coating affect surface roughness and color stability, aiming to refine fabrication methods and enhance patient satisfaction.
Twenty-seven polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) resin samples were designed with dimensions of 10 mm × 2 mm and were 3D printed with three different printing orientations (0°, 45°, and 90°), followed by support removal and polishing. After the evaluation, the samples were coated with the layer of PMMA resin.
Standard tessellation language files as the basis for sample preparation were generated using the Autodesk Meshmixer software and exported to 3D printer for the AM of the specimens. The samples underwent assessment for surface roughness and color stability, forming the three groups with different printing orientations. Subsequently, each sample was coated with unpolymerized PMMA resin and polymerized with ultraviolet light, forming the other three groups following coating. After this process, the samples were reevaluated for surface properties, forming the basis of the study's six distinct groups.
The data was tabulated and evaluated for the mean and the standard deviation.
Upon statistical analysis, the surface roughness of 3D printed polished PMMA resin polished and coated PMMA resin for all printing orientations (P < 0.001). The surface roughness was highest at a 45° angle, followed by 90°, with the lowest roughness observed at 0°. Similarly, in polished and coated PMMA resin, roughness was significantly higher at 45° compared to 0° and 90° but no significant difference between 0° and 90° (P > 0.05). For the color stability parameter, color change (∆E) values showed no significant difference for the three printing orientations (P > 0.05) and among the six study groups.
Different printing orientation markedly affects surface roughness and color stability, while coating with PMMA resin had significantly reduced the surface roughness without a significant impact on color stability. Thus, meticulous selection of printing orientation is essential for achieving desired surface properties.
本研究深入探讨抛光和涂层后不同打印方向如何影响表面粗糙度和颜色稳定性,旨在优化制作方法并提高患者满意度。
设计了27个聚甲基丙烯酸甲酯(PMMA)树脂样本,尺寸为10毫米×2毫米,并采用三种不同的打印方向(0°、45°和90°)进行3D打印,随后去除支撑并进行抛光。评估后,样本涂覆一层PMMA树脂。
使用Autodesk Meshmixer软件生成标准细分语言文件作为样本制备的基础,并导出到3D打印机进行标本的增材制造。对样本进行表面粗糙度和颜色稳定性评估,形成具有不同打印方向的三组。随后,每个样本涂覆未聚合的PMMA树脂并用紫外线聚合,形成涂覆后的另外三组。此过程之后,对样本的表面性能进行重新评估,形成该研究的六个不同组别的基础。
将数据制成表格并评估均值和标准差。
经统计分析,所有打印方向的3D打印抛光PMMA树脂和涂覆PMMA树脂的表面粗糙度(P < 0.001)。表面粗糙度在45°角时最高,其次是90°,在0°时观察到的粗糙度最低。同样,在抛光和涂覆的PMMA树脂中,45°时的粗糙度明显高于0°和90°,但0°和90°之间无显著差异(P > 0.05)。对于颜色稳定性参数,三种打印方向以及六个研究组之间的颜色变化(∆E)值均无显著差异(P > 0.05)。
不同的打印方向显著影响表面粗糙度和颜色稳定性,而涂覆PMMA树脂可显著降低表面粗糙度,且对颜色稳定性无显著影响。因此,精心选择打印方向对于获得所需的表面性能至关重要。