Hjalmarsson Clara, Thakur Tanvee, Rådegran Göran, Björklund Erik, Wåhlander Håkan, Nisell Magnus, Papageorgiou Joanna-Maria, Söderberg Stefan, Lautsch Dominik, Kjellström Barbro
Department of Cardiology Sahlgrenska University Hospital Gothenburg Sweden.
Institute of Medicine at Sahlgrenska Academy University of Gothenburg Gothenburg Sweden.
Pulm Circ. 2025 Jul 18;15(3):e70132. doi: 10.1002/pul2.70132. eCollection 2025 Jul.
Evidence on the predictive ability of risk assessment models for event-free survival (EFS) in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension is scarce. We aimed to investigate the relationship between risk status at 6 months after diagnosis (6 M) and EFS, by three risk models: Multicomponent Improvement (MCI), ESC/ERS 4-Strata Risk (4SR), and noninvasive French PH Registry Score (FRS). Data collected in the Swedish PAH Registry 2008-2021 were used. The study population was risk-stratified at 6 M according to each model. Information on PAH-related hospitalization (HOSP) was collected from the National Patient Register. EFS was defined as survival without occurrence of: (1) HOSP; (2) initiation of parenteral prostacyclin therapy or dose increase ≥ 10%; (3) lung transplantation. The association between risk and EFS was evaluated by Kaplan-Meier estimates and Cox proportional models. The analysis included 411 incident patients, median age 66 y [50, 73]. Median survival time was 3.5 y [1.7; 5.4], and cumulative EFS was 55%. In a Cox proportional regression adjusted for age, eGFR, obesity, atrial fibrillation, and systemic hypertension, EFS was higher in patients who: (1) achieved two or three MCI criteria compared to one or no MCI criterion (HR 0.58; CI 0.39-0.84, = 0.005); (2) were assessed as low, intermediate-low, or intermediate-high compared to high risk (HR 0.16; CI 0.09-0.28, < 0.001); or (3) fulfilled one, two, or three low-risk FRS criteria, compared to no low-risk criterion (HR 0.29; CI 0.19-0.43, < 0.001). Performing a risk assessment 6 months after diagnosis effectively predicts the likelihood of EFS in the studied population, highlighting its prognostic value.
关于肺动脉高压患者无事件生存期(EFS)风险评估模型预测能力的证据很少。我们旨在通过三种风险模型:多因素改善(MCI)、欧洲心脏病学会/欧洲呼吸学会4分层风险(4SR)和无创法国肺动脉高压注册评分(FRS),研究诊断后6个月(6M)时的风险状态与EFS之间的关系。使用了瑞典肺动脉高压注册中心2008年至2021年收集的数据。根据每个模型,研究人群在6M时进行了风险分层。从国家患者注册中心收集了与肺动脉高压相关的住院(HOSP)信息。EFS定义为无以下情况发生的生存期:(1)HOSP;(2)开始肠外前列环素治疗或剂量增加≥10%;(3)肺移植。通过Kaplan-Meier估计和Cox比例模型评估风险与EFS之间的关联。分析纳入了411例初发患者,中位年龄66岁[50,73]。中位生存时间为3.5年[1.7;(5.4)],累积EFS为55%。在对年龄、估算肾小球滤过率、肥胖、心房颤动和系统性高血压进行校正的Cox比例回归分析中,以下患者的EFS更高:(1)达到两条或三条MCI标准的患者与达到一条或未达到MCI标准的患者相比(风险比0.58;可信区间0.39 - 0.84,P = 0.005);(2)被评估为低、中低或中高风险的患者与高风险患者相比(风险比0.16;可信区间0.09 - 0.28,P < 0.001);或(3)满足一条、两条或三条低风险FRS标准的患者与未满足低风险标准的患者相比(风险比0.29;可信区间0.19 - 0.43,P < 0.001)。诊断后6个月进行风险评估可有效预测研究人群中EFS的可能性,突出了其预后价值。