Suppr超能文献

肺动脉高压的风险评估模型与无事件生存期

Risk Assessment Models and Event-Free Survival in Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension.

作者信息

Hjalmarsson Clara, Thakur Tanvee, Rådegran Göran, Björklund Erik, Wåhlander Håkan, Nisell Magnus, Papageorgiou Joanna-Maria, Söderberg Stefan, Lautsch Dominik, Kjellström Barbro

机构信息

Department of Cardiology Sahlgrenska University Hospital Gothenburg Sweden.

Institute of Medicine at Sahlgrenska Academy University of Gothenburg Gothenburg Sweden.

出版信息

Pulm Circ. 2025 Jul 18;15(3):e70132. doi: 10.1002/pul2.70132. eCollection 2025 Jul.

Abstract

Evidence on the predictive ability of risk assessment models for event-free survival (EFS) in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension is scarce. We aimed to investigate the relationship between risk status at 6 months after diagnosis (6 M) and EFS, by three risk models: Multicomponent Improvement (MCI), ESC/ERS 4-Strata Risk (4SR), and noninvasive French PH Registry Score (FRS). Data collected in the Swedish PAH Registry 2008-2021 were used. The study population was risk-stratified at 6 M according to each model. Information on PAH-related hospitalization (HOSP) was collected from the National Patient Register. EFS was defined as survival without occurrence of: (1) HOSP; (2) initiation of parenteral prostacyclin therapy or dose increase ≥ 10%; (3) lung transplantation. The association between risk and EFS was evaluated by Kaplan-Meier estimates and Cox proportional models. The analysis included 411 incident patients, median age 66 y [50, 73]. Median survival time was 3.5 y [1.7; 5.4], and cumulative EFS was 55%. In a Cox proportional regression adjusted for age, eGFR, obesity, atrial fibrillation, and systemic hypertension, EFS was higher in patients who: (1) achieved two or three MCI criteria compared to one or no MCI criterion (HR 0.58; CI 0.39-0.84,  = 0.005); (2) were assessed as low, intermediate-low, or intermediate-high compared to high risk (HR 0.16; CI 0.09-0.28,  < 0.001); or (3) fulfilled one, two, or three low-risk FRS criteria, compared to no low-risk criterion (HR 0.29; CI 0.19-0.43,  < 0.001). Performing a risk assessment 6 months after diagnosis effectively predicts the likelihood of EFS in the studied population, highlighting its prognostic value.

摘要

关于肺动脉高压患者无事件生存期(EFS)风险评估模型预测能力的证据很少。我们旨在通过三种风险模型:多因素改善(MCI)、欧洲心脏病学会/欧洲呼吸学会4分层风险(4SR)和无创法国肺动脉高压注册评分(FRS),研究诊断后6个月(6M)时的风险状态与EFS之间的关系。使用了瑞典肺动脉高压注册中心2008年至2021年收集的数据。根据每个模型,研究人群在6M时进行了风险分层。从国家患者注册中心收集了与肺动脉高压相关的住院(HOSP)信息。EFS定义为无以下情况发生的生存期:(1)HOSP;(2)开始肠外前列环素治疗或剂量增加≥10%;(3)肺移植。通过Kaplan-Meier估计和Cox比例模型评估风险与EFS之间的关联。分析纳入了411例初发患者,中位年龄66岁[50,73]。中位生存时间为3.5年[1.7;(5.4)],累积EFS为55%。在对年龄、估算肾小球滤过率、肥胖、心房颤动和系统性高血压进行校正的Cox比例回归分析中,以下患者的EFS更高:(1)达到两条或三条MCI标准的患者与达到一条或未达到MCI标准的患者相比(风险比0.58;可信区间0.39 - 0.84,P = 0.005);(2)被评估为低、中低或中高风险的患者与高风险患者相比(风险比0.16;可信区间0.09 - 0.28,P < 0.001);或(3)满足一条、两条或三条低风险FRS标准的患者与未满足低风险标准的患者相比(风险比0.29;可信区间0.19 - 0.43,P < 0.001)。诊断后6个月进行风险评估可有效预测研究人群中EFS的可能性,突出了其预后价值。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b649/12272513/656690d5bf22/PUL2-15-e70132-g002.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验