Suppr超能文献

关节周围注射与静脉注射类固醇对接受局部浸润镇痛的全膝关节置换术患者术后疼痛和恶心的疗效:一项系统评价和网状Meta分析

Efficacy of periarticular versus intravenous steroid on postoperative pain and nausea in patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty with local infiltration analgesia: A systematic review and network meta-analysis.

作者信息

Kwak Sang Gyu, Kwon Jae Bum, Seo Young Woo, Choi Won-Kee

机构信息

Department of Medical Statistics, College of Medicine, Daegu Catholic University, Daegu, Korea.

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, College of Medicine, Daegu Catholic University, Daegu, Korea.

出版信息

Medicine (Baltimore). 2025 Jul 18;104(29):e43140. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000043140.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

To compare the effects of postoperative pain relief, nausea relief, and occurrence of adverse effects associated with steroid use between single-dose intravenous steroid (SDIV) and periarticular injection (PAI) of steroid after total knee arthroplasty.

METHODS

This systematic review and network meta-analysis was conducted in accordance with PRISMA guidelines. Randomized controlled trials involving patients undergoing primary unilateral total knee arthroplasty with local infiltration analgesia were included. Studies comparing SDIV, PAI, or no steroid use were selected through a comprehensive search of PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library (January 1990-March 2024). Non-English articles, case reports, protocols, and non-randomized controlled trials were excluded. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias 2.0 tool. A frequentist network meta-analysis was performed to synthesize data on quantitative outcomes (visual analog scale scores, range of motion, flexion angle, opioid consumption) and qualitative outcomes (postoperative nausea and vomiting [PONV], wound complications). Treatment rankings were estimated using surface under the cumulative ranking area values.

RESULTS

Compared to the control group, both SDIV and PAI significantly reduced postoperative visual analog scale scores at rest and during activity up to postoperative day 2. On day 3, SDIV maintained superior pain relief, while PAI effects plateaued. Range of motion and flexion angle were significantly improved in both steroid groups, with PAI showing a slight advantage in early recovery. Opioid consumption was consistently lower in the steroid groups, especially with PAI. Incidence of PONV was lowest in the SDIV group, indicating superior antiemetic effects. No significant differences were observed in wound complication rates across the groups.

CONCLUSION

In clinical practice, intravenous steroids may be considered for patients at higher risk of PONV, while periarticular steroids may be preferred for enhancing localized pain control in the early postoperative period.

摘要

背景

比较单剂量静脉注射类固醇(SDIV)和全膝关节置换术后关节周围注射类固醇(PAI)在术后疼痛缓解、恶心缓解以及与类固醇使用相关的不良反应发生情况方面的效果。

方法

本系统评价和网状Meta分析按照PRISMA指南进行。纳入了涉及接受局部浸润镇痛的初次单侧全膝关节置换术患者的随机对照试验。通过全面检索PubMed、Embase和Cochrane图书馆(1990年1月至2024年3月)筛选比较SDIV、PAI或不使用类固醇的研究。排除非英文文章、病例报告、方案和非随机对照试验。使用Cochrane偏倚风险2.0工具评估偏倚风险。进行频率学派网状Meta分析以综合定量结果(视觉模拟量表评分、活动范围、屈曲角度、阿片类药物消耗量)和定性结果(术后恶心呕吐[PONV]、伤口并发症)的数据。使用累积排名面积值下的面积估计治疗排名。

结果

与对照组相比,SDIV和PAI在术后第2天之前均显著降低了静息和活动时的术后视觉模拟量表评分。在第3天,SDIV保持了更好的疼痛缓解效果,而PAI的效果趋于平稳。两个类固醇组的活动范围和屈曲角度均显著改善,PAI在早期恢复方面略有优势。类固醇组的阿片类药物消耗量一直较低,尤其是PAI组。SDIV组的PONV发生率最低,表明其具有更好的止吐效果。各组之间的伤口并发症发生率未观察到显著差异。

结论

在临床实践中,对于PONV风险较高的患者可考虑使用静脉类固醇,而关节周围类固醇可能更适合在术后早期增强局部疼痛控制。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验