Alhudaithi Abdullah Saleh, Almutairi Faris Jaser, Almansour Abdullah Saleh, Aljeadi Abdurrahman Abdurrazzaq, Kolarkodi Shaul Hameed
Medical City Dental Clinics, College of Dentistry, Qassim University, Qassim 51452, Saudi Arabia;
Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, College of Dentistry, Qassim University, Qassim 51452, Saudi Arabia.
Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr. 2025 Jul 3;18(3):31. doi: 10.3390/cmtr18030031. eCollection 2025 Sep.
This review aimed to examine and highlight the treatment protocols and optimal duration of antibiotic regimens used in managing maxillofacial space infections of odontogenic origin, along with the associated clinical outcomes.
This systematic review followed PRISMA guidelines and was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42024621000). A comprehensive search of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar was conducted for studies from January 2003 to October 2024 using relevant MeSH terms. Studies were selected based on PEO criteria, focusing on the antibiotic treatment protocols and duration for odontogenic maxillofacial space infections, with inclusion of original human research and exclusion of non-relevant or unclear studies. Two independent reviewers performed study selection, data extraction, and risk of bias assessments using the Cochrane RoB 2 and ROBINS-I tools, resolving disagreements through discussion.
After data extraction, 277 papers were initially identified. Following the removal of duplicates, 141 articles were screened, of which 64 were selected for full-text assessment and 55 were excluded with justification. Ultimately, nine studies met the inclusion criteria for this review. These included two prospective double-blinded randomized clinical trials (RCTs), two prospective RCTs, four retrospective studies, and one prospective study, all involving patients with dentoalveolar orofacial infections. Risk of bias (RoB) assessment using RoB 2 indicated that two RCTs had a high risk of bias, one had a low risk, and one raised some concerns. ROBINS-I assessment showed moderate risk of bias in three studies, while two were not evaluated.
This review concludes that prompt incision and drainage combined with a short-course antibiotic regimen of two to five days is generally effective for managing odontogenic maxillofacial space infections, though further high-quality randomized trials are needed to standardize treatment protocols.
本综述旨在研究并强调用于治疗牙源性颌面间隙感染的抗生素治疗方案及最佳疗程,以及相关的临床结局。
本系统综述遵循PRISMA指南,并在PROSPERO(CRD42024621000)注册。使用相关医学主题词对2003年1月至2024年10月期间的PubMed、Scopus、科学网和谷歌学术进行全面检索,以查找相关研究。根据PEO标准选择研究,重点关注牙源性颌面间隙感染的抗生素治疗方案和疗程,纳入原创性人体研究,排除不相关或不明确的研究。两名独立评审员使用Cochrane RoB 2和ROBINS-I工具进行研究选择、数据提取和偏倚风险评估,通过讨论解决分歧。
数据提取后,初步识别出277篇论文。去除重复项后,筛选了141篇文章,其中64篇被选作全文评估,55篇被合理排除。最终,9项研究符合本综述的纳入标准。其中包括两项前瞻性双盲随机临床试验(RCT)、两项前瞻性RCT、四项回顾性研究和一项前瞻性研究,均涉及牙槽突口腔面部感染患者。使用RoB 2进行的偏倚风险(RoB)评估表明,两项RCT存在高偏倚风险,一项为低风险,一项存在一些问题。ROBINS-I评估显示三项研究存在中度偏倚风险,两项未进行评估。
本综述得出结论,及时切开引流并联合使用两到五天的短疗程抗生素方案通常对治疗牙源性颌面间隙感染有效,不过需要进一步开展高质量随机试验以规范治疗方案。