Ruiz-Camacho Cristina, Gozalo Margarita, Sánchez Casado Inmaculada
Department of Psychology and Anthropology, Faculty of Education and Psychology, University of Extremadura, 06071 Badajoz, Spain.
Department of Psychology and Anthropology, Faculty of Sport Science (Psychology Laboratory), University of Extremadura, 10005 Caceres, Spain.
Healthcare (Basel). 2025 Jul 11;13(14):1674. doi: 10.3390/healthcare13141674.
: Academic stress is a major factor affecting university students' psychological well-being and overall functioning. This study examined whether three active coping strategies-positive reappraisal, social support seeking, and strategic planning-mediate the relationship between academic stressors and self-reported stress responses. : A quantitative, cross-sectional, non-experimental design was employed. The sample comprised 1014 students from the University of Extremadura (M = 20.56, SD = 3.50). Three subscales of the Academic Stress Questionnaire (CEA) were administered: Academic Stressors (E-CEA), Stress Responses (R-CEA), and Coping Strategies (A-CEA). Descriptive statistics, correlation analyses, and a multiple mediation model using structural equation modeling (SEM) tested direct and indirect effects, controlling for gender, study year, and academic field. : (1) Academic stressors were inversely related to positive reappraisal ( = -0.34, < 0.001), planning ( = -0.12, < 0.001), and social support seeking ( = -0.09, < 0.01). (2) All three coping strategies were significantly associated with fewer stress symptoms, with positive reappraisal showing the strongest effect ( = -0.13, < 0.001), followed by social support seeking ( = -0.06, < 0.05) and planning ( = -0.03, < 0.05). (3) Stressors had a strong positive direct effect on stress responses ( = 0.54, < 0.001). (4) Coping strategies partially mediated the stressor-symptom link (total indirect effect: = 0.12, < 0.001, 95% CI [0.08, 0.16]). : Active coping partially buffers the negative effects of academic stressors on perceived distress. Findings underscore the importance of enhancing students' coping skills and implementing institutional policies that reduce structural stress and support psychological well-being.
学业压力是影响大学生心理健康和整体机能的一个主要因素。本研究考察了三种积极应对策略——积极重新评价、寻求社会支持和策略规划——是否在学业压力源与自我报告的压力反应之间的关系中起中介作用。
采用了定量、横断面、非实验性设计。样本包括来自埃斯特雷马杜拉大学的1014名学生(M = 20.56,SD = 3.50)。使用了学业压力问卷(CEA)的三个子量表:学业压力源(E - CEA)、压力反应(R - CEA)和应对策略(A - CEA)。进行了描述性统计、相关分析,并使用结构方程模型(SEM)的多重中介模型检验了直接和间接效应,同时控制了性别、学年和学术领域。
(1)学业压力源与积极重新评价(β = -0.34,p < 0.001)、规划(β = -0.12,p < 0.001)和寻求社会支持(β = -0.09,p < 0.01)呈负相关。
(2)所有三种应对策略都与较少的压力症状显著相关,积极重新评价的影响最强(β = -0.13,p < 0.001),其次是寻求社会支持(β = -0.06,p < 0.05)和规划(β = -0.03,p < 0.05)。
(3)压力源对压力反应有很强的正向直接效应(β = 0.54,p < 0.001)。
(4)应对策略部分中介了压力源 - 症状的联系(总间接效应:β = 0.12,p < 0.001,95%CI [0.08, 0.16])。
积极应对部分缓冲了学业压力源对感知到的痛苦的负面影响。研究结果强调了提高学生应对技能以及实施减少结构性压力和支持心理健康的机构政策的重要性。