Farey John E, Alland Tania, Naylor Justine M, Kelly Thu-Lan, Cashman Kara, Lorimer Michelle, Holder Carl, Lewin Adriane M, Garden Frances, Law Chi Kin, Close Jacqueline C T, Graves Stephen E, Steiger Richard de, Lewis Peter L, Adie Sam, Lujic Sanja, Harris Ian A
Institute for Musculoskeletal Health, King George V Building, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry, South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute, Adelaide, South Australia.
Bone Jt Open. 2025 Aug 4;6(8):866-875. doi: 10.1302/2633-1462.68.BJO-2025-0042.
A statistical analysis plan for analysis of DISTINCT (Dual-mobIlity verSus conventional Total hip arthroplasty In femoral Neck fractures, a registry-nested, open-label, Cluster-randomized crossover Trial) is outlined to aid transparency in analytical procedures.
DISTINCT aims to determine whether dual-mobility total hip arthroplasty (THA) is superior to conventional THA in reducing postoperative prosthetic hip dislocations in patients undergoing surgery for femoral neck fractures. The trial is nested within the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry (AOANJRR). The clusters comprised hospitals that perform at least 12 THAs for femoral neck fracture per annum. Each hospital was randomized to two sequential periods of dual-mobility THA and conventional THA, with the order randomly allocated. Crossover occurred once sites had recruited an average of 16 patients eligible for the primary analysis in the initial allocation, to provide an average of 32 patients per cluster. The primary outcome is the incidence of prosthetic hip dislocation in the first postoperative year. Secondary outcomes are the rate of revision for dislocation, all-cause revision, mortality at one, two, and five years, and complication rates at one year. All analyses will use cluster summary methods, weighted by cluster size to account for unequal cluster sizes. Participants will be analyzed in the groups to which they were randomized (intention-to-treat). Sensitivity analyses will be performed to analyze the unadjusted primary outcome based on treatment received (as-treated) and per-protocol groupings.
This statistical analysis plan describes the detailed analysis of the DISTINCT study, a registry-nested, open-label, cluster-randomized crossover trial that will provide supporting evidence for prosthesis choice in the common clinical problem of femoral neck fracture.
概述DISTINCT(双动型与传统型全髋关节置换术治疗股骨颈骨折的比较,一项注册登记嵌套、开放标签、整群随机交叉试验)的统计分析计划,以提高分析程序的透明度。
DISTINCT旨在确定双动型全髋关节置换术(THA)在降低股骨颈骨折手术患者术后人工髋关节脱位方面是否优于传统THA。该试验嵌套于澳大利亚骨科协会国家关节置换登记处(AOANJRR)。整群包括每年至少进行12例股骨颈骨折THA手术的医院。每家医院被随机分配到两个连续的双动型THA和传统THA时期,顺序随机分配。一旦各研究点在初始分配中招募了平均16例符合初步分析条件的患者,即发生交叉,以确保每个整群平均有32例患者。主要结局是术后第一年人工髋关节脱位的发生率。次要结局包括脱位翻修率、全因翻修率、1年、2年和5年的死亡率以及1年的并发症发生率。所有分析将采用整群汇总方法,并根据整群大小加权,以考虑整群大小不等的情况。参与者将按随机分组进行分析(意向性分析)。将进行敏感性分析,以根据接受的治疗(实际治疗)和符合方案分组分析未经调整的主要结局。
本统计分析计划描述了DISTINCT研究的详细分析,该研究是一项注册登记嵌套、开放标签、整群随机交叉试验,将为股骨颈骨折这一常见临床问题的假体选择提供支持性证据。