Jaber Diana, Zhang Jessica, Godley Lucy A
Department of Medicine, Northwestern Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
J Clin Invest. 2025 Aug 1;135(15). doi: 10.1172/JCI190264.
As the use of molecular profiling of tumors expands, cancer diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment planning increasingly rely on the information it provides. Although primarily designed to detect somatic variants, next-generation sequencing (NGS) tumor-based profiling also identifies germline DNA alterations, necessitating careful clinical interpretation of the data. Traditionally, germline risk testing has depended on prioritizing individuals based on physical exam findings consistent with known hereditary cancer syndromes, tumor-specific features, age at diagnosis, personal history, and family history. As NGS-based molecular profiling is used increasingly to diagnose, prognosticate, and follow cancer progression, DNA variants that are likely to be of germline origin are identified with increased frequency. Because pathogenic/likely pathogenic germline variants are critical biomarkers for risk stratification and treatment planning, consensus guidelines are expanding to recommend comprehensive germline testing for more cancer patients. This Review highlights the nuances of identifying DNA variants of potential germline origin incidentally at the time of NGS-based molecular profiling and emphasizes key differences between comprehensive germline versus tumor-based platforms, sample types, and analytical methodologies. In the growing era of precision oncology, clinicians should be adept at navigating these distinctions to optimize testing strategies and leverage insights regarding germline cancer risk surveillance and management for all people with cancer.
随着肿瘤分子谱分析的应用不断扩大,癌症的诊断、预后评估和治疗规划越来越依赖于其提供的信息。尽管下一代测序(NGS)肿瘤谱分析主要用于检测体细胞变异,但它也能识别种系DNA改变,因此需要对数据进行仔细的临床解读。传统上,种系风险检测依赖于根据与已知遗传性癌症综合征一致的体格检查结果、肿瘤特异性特征、诊断年龄、个人史和家族史对个体进行优先级排序。随着基于NGS的分子谱分析越来越多地用于癌症的诊断、预后评估和病情监测,种系来源可能性较大的DNA变异被发现的频率也在增加。由于致病性/可能致病性种系变异是风险分层和治疗规划的关键生物标志物,共识指南正在不断扩展,建议对更多癌症患者进行全面的种系检测。本综述重点介绍了在基于NGS的分子谱分析过程中偶然发现潜在种系来源DNA变异时的细微差别,并强调了全面种系检测与基于肿瘤的平台、样本类型及分析方法之间的关键差异。在精准肿瘤学不断发展的时代背景下,临床医生应善于区分这些差异,以优化检测策略,并充分利用有关所有癌症患者种系癌症风险监测和管理的见解。