Feuer Ofir, Holmes Kyla, Kane Sarah, Curry Kathryn M, Ma Daria, Chatwin Chloe A, Chuldzhyan Marie, Quinn Emily, Gorman Nicholas
Keck Graduate Institute, Claremont, California, USA.
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA.
J Genet Couns. 2025 Aug;34(4):e70065. doi: 10.1002/jgc4.70065.
Increased utilization of artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) in genomic medicine and genetic counseling necessitates a well-trained workforce. However, research on the attitudes toward and uptake of AI/ML education among genetic counseling graduate programs (GCGPs) is limited. This mixed-methods study investigated the attitudes, preparedness, and future plans of GCGP leadership toward the integration of AI/ML into curricula and its effect on core competency proficiency. In Phase 1, a nationwide survey gathered quantitative responses from 15 GCGP leaders holding diverse academic positions in genetic counseling program curriculum development. There were mixed perceptions about AI/ML integration into curricula, despite frequent encounters with these technologies in academic settings. Respondents viewed AI/ML as least impactful on interpersonal, psychosocial, and counseling skills within the Accreditation Council for Genetic Counseling (ACGC) competencies, highlighting the value of human expertise in these areas. Phase 2 explored the goals, logistics, and barriers of incorporating AI/ML into GCGP curricula over the next 5 years. A second nationwide survey collected demographic information from 18 respondents, of which 5 were interviewed. Reflexive thematic analysis identified nine key themes: Resources and Training for AI/ML Integration, Motivations for AI/ML Integration, Confidence in Leadership Foresight, Formats and Applications of AI/ML Education in GCGPs, Stages of AI/ML Integration, Barriers to AI/ML Integration, Trade-offs to new Curricula, Interpreting Competency Requirements, and Relevant Content and Contexts for Learning. Interviewees highlighted the need for support in the form of resources, training, and guidelines for AI/ML applications in genetic counseling. This study uncovers opportunities for enhancing integration of AI/ML in genetic counseling education, emphasizing the importance of collaboration among organizations, professional societies, and topic experts. Developing a competency framework specific to AI/ML in genetic counseling could promote tool development and dissemination, ultimately increasing the impact of GCGPs in this evolving field.
在基因组医学和遗传咨询中,人工智能(AI)和机器学习(ML)的应用日益增加,这就需要一支训练有素的专业队伍。然而,关于遗传咨询研究生项目(GCGPs)对AI/ML教育的态度和接受情况的研究却很有限。这项混合方法研究调查了GCGP领导层对将AI/ML纳入课程的态度、准备情况以及未来计划,及其对核心能力熟练程度的影响。在第一阶段,一项全国性调查收集了15位在遗传咨询项目课程开发中担任不同学术职位的GCGP领导人的定量回复。尽管在学术环境中经常接触这些技术,但对于将AI/ML纳入课程存在不同看法。受访者认为AI/ML对遗传咨询认证委员会(ACGC)能力中的人际、心理社会和咨询技能影响最小,凸显了这些领域人类专业知识的价值。第二阶段探讨了在未来5年内将AI/ML纳入GCGP课程的目标、后勤和障碍。第二项全国性调查收集了18位受访者的人口统计信息,其中5人接受了访谈。反思性主题分析确定了九个关键主题:AI/ML整合的资源与培训、AI/ML整合的动机、对领导层远见的信心、GCGPs中AI/ML教育的形式与应用、AI/ML整合的阶段、AI/ML整合的障碍、新课程的权衡、能力要求的解读以及学习的相关内容与背景。受访者强调需要以资源、培训和遗传咨询中AI/ML应用指南的形式提供支持。本研究揭示了加强AI/ML在遗传咨询教育中整合的机会,强调了组织(机构)、专业协会和主题专家之间合作的重要性。制定特定于遗传咨询中AI/ML的能力框架可以促进工具开发和传播,最终增加GCGPs在这个不断发展的领域中的影响力。