van Wessel Margit, Manchanda Rita, Deo Nandini
Strategic Communication Chair Group, Wageningen University & Research, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
Independent Researcher, New Delhi, India.
J Civ Soc. 2025 Jun 23:1-19. doi: 10.1080/17448689.2025.2515038.
Restriction of civic space is widely understood as a condition that constrains the autonomous role of civil society organizations. However, this conceptualization is delimiting. This paper explores civic space as constituted in the dynamics between civil society organizations and state actors, contributing to an emergent shift to a more processual, relational and agential understanding of civic space, involving a redefining of civil society roles by state and civil society actors acting and reacting within their everyday work. We explore the case of India. Based on 36 interviews with state and civil society actors, the paper. shows how the state marginalizes civil society through three pathways: delegitimation, displacement and repurposing. A fourth pattern, however, qualifies this marginalization: political roles for civil society continue to be sought and found, depending on situations and the specific actors involved, based on their interpretations and political advantages at stake for them. The broader significance of these findings is, first, that everyday understanding and experience of civic space may prominently revolve around changes in civil society roles. Second, these changes in roles may best be understood at the level of concrete cases of relating and political contention, doing justice to the agency of the actors involved.
公民空间的限制被广泛理解为一种限制民间社会组织自主作用的状况。然而,这种概念界定是有局限性的。本文将公民空间视为在民间社会组织与国家行为体之间的动态关系中构成的,这有助于实现一种新兴的转变,即对公民空间有更具过程性、关联性和能动性的理解,这涉及到国家和民间社会行为体在日常工作中相互作用和反应时对民间社会角色的重新定义。我们以印度为例进行探讨。基于对国家和民间社会行为体的36次访谈,本文展示了国家通过三种途径边缘化民间社会:使其丧失合法性、取而代之以及改变用途。然而,第四种模式使这种边缘化情况变得更为复杂:民间社会的政治角色仍在根据具体情况以及相关的特定行为体而被寻求和发现,这取决于他们的解读以及所涉及的政治利益。这些研究结果的更广泛意义在于,首先,公民空间的日常理解和体验可能主要围绕民间社会角色的变化展开。其次,这些角色变化最好在具体的关系案例和政治争拗层面来理解,从而公正地对待相关行为体的能动性。