Sakibaev Kyialbek, Meshtel Alexander, Grichanova Tatyana, Suiunov Kylychbek, Eshiev Abdyrakhman, Dzholdubaev Sagynbek, Tashmatova Nazgul, Nuruev Mirlan, Alimbekova Aiperi, Argynbaeva Akmaral, Kyzy Uulkan Manas, Keneshbaev Bekbolot, Karimova Kulpunai
Department of Natural Sciences and Humanities, Osh International Medical University, Osh, Kyrgyzstan.
Department of Normal and Topographical Anatomy, Medical Faculty, Osh State University, Osh, Kyrgyzstan.
J Electr Bioimpedance. 2025 Aug 4;16(1):99-106. doi: 10.2478/joeb-2025-0013. eCollection 2025 Jan.
Body physique assessment is important for various fields of science and practice, including anthropology, medicine, sports nutrition and pedagogy. The classic Heath-Carter method is complex and multi-step, while bioelectrical impedance analysis makes it easier and faster to evaluate this parameter. The purpose of this study is a comparative analysis of the anthropometric method and bio-electrical impedance analysis in assessing the somatotype. Differences and a low degree of agreement were found between these methods in determining the somatotype.
Studies were carried out at the Department of Anatomy and Biological Anthropology of the Russian University of Sports "SCOLIPE" (Russia) and the morphological departments of the medical faculties of Osh State University (OshSU) of the Kyrgyz Republic from February to April 2024.
Bioelectrical impedance analysis quickly and more significantly speeds up the process of assessing a person's body type.
Bioimpe-dance analysis shows an increased level of mesomorphy scores in both males and females, and the difference in males is more pronounced. On the other hand, endomorphy scores were lower when assessing the somatotype using the anthropometric method.
身体形态评估对包括人类学、医学、运动营养和教育学在内的各个科学和实践领域都很重要。经典的希思-卡特方法复杂且步骤多,而生物电阻抗分析使评估该参数变得更容易、更快。本研究的目的是对人体测量法和生物电阻抗分析在评估体型方面进行比较分析。在确定体型方面,这些方法之间存在差异且一致性程度较低。
研究于2024年2月至4月在俄罗斯体育大学“SCOLIPE”(俄罗斯)的解剖学和生物人类学系以及吉尔吉斯共和国奥什国立大学(奥什国立大学)医学院的形态学系进行。
生物电阻抗分析快速且更显著地加快了评估一个人体型的过程。
生物电阻抗分析显示男性和女性的中胚层体型得分水平都有所提高,且男性的差异更明显。另一方面,使用人体测量法评估体型时,内胚层体型得分较低。