Ramirez Ferrer Esteban, Zuluaga-Garcia Juan Pablo, Alzate Juan Diego, Mayorga-Corvacho Juliana, Sierra Maria Alejandra, Garzon-Duque Maria Osley, Daza-Ovalle Alberto, Madrinan-Navia Humberto, Riveros-Castillo Mauricio
Department of Neurosurgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Department of Neurosurgery, Center of Research and Training in Neurosurgery, Bogota, Colombia.
J Neurooncol. 2025 Aug 12. doi: 10.1007/s11060-025-05198-4.
Explore the impact of healthcare disparities in patients with high-grade glioma (HGG) in the Colombia's universal healthcare model setting, aiming to assess access to adjuvant treatment and survival outcomes among HGG patients covered under contributory versus subsidized insurance schemes in Bogotá, Colombia.
A retrospective cohort study was conducted in two academic neurosurgical centers in Bogotá, Colombia, each serving patient populations with a differential distribution by insurance scheme. Adult patients with newly diagnosed high-grade glioma (HGG) who underwent surgical management between 2017 and 2021 were included. Patients with recurrent disease at presentation or lost to follow-up after surgery were excluded. Demographic, clinical, surgical, and treatment data were collected. The primary outcome was overall survival, assessed through medical records and the national death registry. A propensity score model with inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) was used to adjust for confounding. Cox proportional hazards and logistic regression models were applied.
A total of 113 patients were included; 88 had contributory coverage and 25 had subsidized coverage. Patients in the subsidized group had significantly lower rates of postoperative medical oncology consultation (48% vs. 84%, 95% p < 0.001), chemotherapy (28% vs. 68.2%, p < 0.001), and radiotherapy (8% vs. 56.3%, p < 0.001). Median overall survival was significantly lower in the subsidized group (9.8 vs. 16.5 months, p = 0.006). After IPTW adjustment, subsidized insurance (HR 1.66, 95% CI 1.03-2.68, p = 0.035), subtotal resection (HR 1.58, 95% CI 1.01-2.49, p = 0.045), and lack of oncology consultation (HR 5.24, 95% CI 1.21-22.63, p = 0.026) were independently predicted worse survival. Female sex (OR 2.59, p = 0.045) and subsidized coverage (OR 8.21, p < 0.001) were associated with failure to complete oncology follow-up.
In the context of a universal healthcare system such as Colombia's, differences in access to adjuvant therapy may contribute to survival disparities among patients with high-grade gliomas. While formal insurance coverage is broadly available, it does not necessarily ensure timely or equitable care delivery. Additionally, our findings suggest that gender-related factors may influence access to postoperative oncology care. Efforts to strengthen care coordination, address structural barriers, and ensure equitable access across insurance types and sexes could help improve outcomes in this population.
在哥伦比亚全民医疗模式背景下,探讨高级别胶质瘤(HGG)患者医疗保健差异的影响,旨在评估哥伦比亚波哥大参加缴费型保险与补贴型保险计划的HGG患者接受辅助治疗的情况及生存结果。
在哥伦比亚波哥大的两个学术神经外科中心进行了一项回顾性队列研究,每个中心服务的患者群体按保险计划分布不同。纳入2017年至2021年间接受手术治疗的新诊断高级别胶质瘤(HGG)成年患者。排除就诊时患有复发性疾病或术后失访的患者。收集人口统计学、临床、手术和治疗数据。主要结局为总生存期,通过病历和国家死亡登记处进行评估。使用具有治疗权重逆概率(IPTW)的倾向评分模型来调整混杂因素。应用Cox比例风险模型和逻辑回归模型。
共纳入113例患者;88例有缴费型保险,25例有补贴型保险。补贴组患者术后医学肿瘤学咨询率(48%对84%,95%p<0.001)、化疗率(28%对68.2%,p<0.001)和放疗率(8%对56.3%,p<0.001)显著较低。补贴组的中位总生存期显著较短(9.8个月对16.5个月,p = 0.006)。经过IPTW调整后,补贴型保险(HR 1.66,95%CI 1.03 - 2.68,p = 0.035)、次全切除(HR 1.58,95%CI 1.01 - 2.49,p = 0.045)和缺乏肿瘤学咨询(HR 5.24,95%CI 1.21 - 22.63,p = 0.026)独立预测生存期较差。女性(OR 2.59,p = 0.045)和补贴型保险(OR 8.21,p<0.001)与未能完成肿瘤学随访相关。
在哥伦比亚这样的全民医疗系统背景下,辅助治疗可及性的差异可能导致高级别胶质瘤患者的生存差异。虽然广泛提供正式保险覆盖,但这不一定能确保及时或公平的医疗服务提供。此外,我们的研究结果表明,与性别相关的因素可能影响术后肿瘤学护理的可及性。加强护理协调、消除结构性障碍以及确保不同保险类型和性别之间公平可及的努力,有助于改善该人群的结局。