Keriven Hugo, Sánchez-Sierra Alberto, de-la-Plaza-San-Frutos Marta, García-Pérez-de-Sevilla Guillermo, Clemente-Suarez Vicente, Garcia-Laredo Eduardo, Saenz-Bravo Marisa, Owoeye Oluwatoyosi B A, Miñambres-Martín Diego, Domínguez-Balmaseda Diego
Department of Physiotherapy, Faculty of Medicine, Health and Sports, Universidad Europea de Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
Department of Real Madrid Graduate School, Faculty of Medicine, Health and Sports, Universidad Europea de Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
Front Psychol. 2025 Jul 29;16:1604783. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1604783. eCollection 2025.
Sports-related injuries occur at rates ranging from 0.5 to 34 per 1,000 practice hours and are a leading cause of early retirement, with psychosocial factors influencing recovery. Injury prevention remains a priority because of its financial and performance impacts on teams. Psychological factors, such as attention disturbances, negative life events, and arousal levels, can impact an athlete's risk of injury, although psychological interventions are rarely used in sports. Fear of failure, a major stress factor, negatively affects athletes' motivation and self-perception. Stress and recovery responses vary across cultures, with European and American athletes employing different strategies. Understanding these cultural differences could help tailor interventions to improve performance and wellbeing. This study compared stress and recovery parameters between American and European student-athletes. This observational pilot clinical trial aimed to assess stress and quality of life among young athletes from two universities: Universidad Europea de Madrid UEM and Saint Louis University (SLU), in pre-season conditions. Participants recruited from their respective soccer teams completed a one-time questionnaire to assess social- and sports-related stress. The study followed ethical guidelines and the questionnaires included tools such as the POMS, RESTQ-52, and the Groningen Sleep Questionnaire. This study found significant differences between the groups across various stress categories, including general, emotional, social, and sports-specific stress, as well as fatigue and disturbed breaks, with -values ranging from 0.005 to 0.035. The effect sizes for these differences were moderate, with values ranging from = -0.321 to = -0.429. Overall, significant differences between the groups were observed, with moderate effect sizes for both general and Overall Stress Scores ( = -0.397 and = -0.414, respectively). This study highlights significant cultural differences in stress, recovery, sleep quality, and mood between student-athletes at UEM and SLU. These findings emphasize the need for tailored psychological interventions and recovery strategies that address athletes' unique stressors and cultural environments and improve their performance and wellbeing.
与运动相关的损伤发生率为每1000个训练小时0.5至34起,是提前退役的主要原因,心理社会因素会影响恢复情况。由于其对团队的财务和表现有影响,预防损伤仍然是一个优先事项。心理因素,如注意力干扰、负面生活事件和唤醒水平,会影响运动员的受伤风险,尽管心理干预在体育界很少使用。对失败的恐惧是一个主要的压力因素,会对运动员的动机和自我认知产生负面影响。压力和恢复反应因文化而异,欧美运动员采用不同的策略。了解这些文化差异有助于定制干预措施,以提高表现和幸福感。本研究比较了美国和欧洲学生运动员之间的压力和恢复参数。这项观察性试点临床试验旨在评估来自两所大学(马德里欧洲大学UEM和圣路易斯大学SLU)的年轻运动员在季前赛条件下的压力和生活质量。从各自足球队招募的参与者完成了一份一次性问卷,以评估与社交和运动相关的压力。该研究遵循伦理准则,问卷包括POMS、RESTQ - 52和格罗宁根睡眠问卷等工具。本研究发现,在包括一般、情绪、社交和特定运动压力以及疲劳和休息受扰等各种压力类别中,两组之间存在显著差异,P值范围为0.005至0.035。这些差异的效应大小为中等,值范围为 = -0.321至 = -0.429。总体而言,观察到两组之间存在显著差异,一般压力得分和总体压力得分的效应大小均为中等(分别为 = -0.397和 = -0.414)。本研究强调了UEM和SLU的学生运动员在压力、恢复、睡眠质量和情绪方面存在显著的文化差异。这些发现强调了需要定制心理干预和恢复策略,以应对运动员独特的压力源和文化环境,并提高他们的表现和幸福感。