Suppr超能文献

准备电位反映了对动作结果的详细预测。

The readiness potential reflects detailed prediction of action outcome.

作者信息

Gärtner Christoph, Dercksen Tjerk, Widmann Andreas, Stenner Max-Philipp, Wetzel Nicole

机构信息

Leibniz Institute for Neurobiology, Magdeburg, Germany.

Wilhelm-Wundt-Institute for Psychology, Leipzig University, Leipzig, Germany.

出版信息

Imaging Neurosci (Camb). 2025 Apr 25;3. doi: 10.1162/imag_a_00546. eCollection 2025.

Abstract

The sensory input arising from our own movements is predictable to varying degrees. This predictability plays a role in action selection, initiation, and the evaluation of action outcomes, and should therefore influence neural processing both before and after movement. Here, we examined the effect of sensory predictability on pre- and post-movement processing, as reflected in two signals in the human electroencephalogram (EEG): the(RP) and the(PMBR). Thirty-six participants performed self-paced button presses in three conditions, in which they received either highly predictable auditory feedback (always the same sound), weakly predictable auditory feedback (an unpredictable, pseudo-random sound), or no auditory feedback. In the former two conditions, 20% of button presses unexpectedly elicited no sound. In these omission trials, we observed brain responses, which indicated that participants formed sensory predictions of a varying level of detail. Crucially, RP amplitude was increased when button presses always produced the same sound, compared to pseudo-random sounds, or no sound, with the latter two conditions showing no difference. In contrast, the PMBR was unchanged across conditions. Our results indicate that the specificity of sensory prediction influences the pre-movement processes reflected in the RP, even when these details are not task-relevant.

摘要

我们自身运动产生的感觉输入在不同程度上是可预测的。这种可预测性在动作选择、启动以及动作结果评估中发挥作用,因此应该会影响运动前后的神经处理过程。在此,我们研究了感觉可预测性对运动前和运动后处理的影响,这在人类脑电图(EEG)的两个信号中有所体现:准备电位(RP)和运动后β节律抑制(PMBR)。三十六名参与者在三种条件下进行了自定节奏的按键操作,在这些条件下,他们分别收到高度可预测的听觉反馈(总是相同的声音)、弱可预测的听觉反馈(不可预测的伪随机声音)或无听觉反馈。在前两种条件下,20%的按键操作意外地未引发声音。在这些遗漏试验中,我们观察到大脑反应,这表明参与者形成了不同细节程度的感觉预测。至关重要的是,与伪随机声音或无声音相比,当按键操作总是产生相同声音时,RP幅度增加,而后两种条件下无差异。相比之下,PMBR在不同条件下保持不变。我们的结果表明,感觉预测的特异性会影响RP所反映的运动前过程,即使这些细节与任务无关。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f937/12319774/b59d6fb885a4/imag_a_00546_fig1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验