Suppr超能文献

认知行为疗法在精神分裂症和分裂情感性障碍中的比较疗效:一项系统评价和Meta回归分析

Comparative Effectiveness of Cognitive Behavioral Therapies in Schizophrenia and Schizoaffective Disorder: A Systematic Review and Meta-Regression Analysis.

作者信息

Karageorgiou Vasilios, Michopoulos Ioannis, Tsigkaropoulou Evdoxia

机构信息

Second Department of Psychiatry, University of Athens, 12462 Athens, Greece.

First Department of Psychiatry, University of Athens, 11528 Athens, Greece.

出版信息

J Clin Med. 2025 Aug 5;14(15):5521. doi: 10.3390/jcm14155521.

Abstract

Cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) has shown consistent efficacy in individuals with psychosis, as supported by many trials. One classical distinction is that between affective and non-affective psychosis. Few studies have specifically examined the possible moderating role of substantial affective elements. In this systematic review and meta-regression analysis, we assess how CBT response differs across the affective spectrum in psychosis. We included studies assessing various CBT modalities, including third-wave therapies, administered in people with psychosis. The study protocol is published in the Open Science Framework. Meta-regression was conducted to assess whether the proportion of participants with affective psychosis (AP), as proxied by a documented diagnosis of schizoaffective (SZA) disorder, moderated CBT efficacy across positive, negative, and depressive symptom domains. The literature search identified 4457 records, of which 39 studies were included. The median proportion of SZA disorder participants was 17%, with a total of 422 AP participants represented. Meta-regression showed a trend toward lower CBT efficacy for positive symptoms with a higher SZA disorder proportion (β = +0.10 SMD per 10% increase in AP; = 0.12), though it was not statistically significant. No significant associations were found for negative (β = +0.05; = 0.73) or depressive symptoms (β = -0.02; = 0.78). Heterogeneity was substantial across all models (I ranging from 54% to 80%), and funnel plot asymmetry was observed in negative and depressive symptoms, indicating possible publication bias. Risk of bias assessment showed the anticipated inherent difficulty of psychotherapies in blinding and possibly dropout rates affecting some studies. Affective symptoms may reduce the effectiveness of CBT for positive symptoms in psychotic disorders, although the findings did not reach statistical significance. Other patient-level characteristics in psychosis could indicate which patients can benefit most from CBT modalities.

摘要

认知行为疗法(CBT)在患有精神病的个体中已显示出持续的疗效,许多试验都支持这一点。一个经典的区别是情感性精神病和非情感性精神病之间的区别。很少有研究专门考察大量情感因素可能起到的调节作用。在这项系统评价和元回归分析中,我们评估了CBT反应在精神病情感谱系中的差异。我们纳入了评估各种CBT模式的研究,包括第三波疗法,这些疗法应用于患有精神病的人群。研究方案发表在开放科学框架中。进行元回归以评估情感性精神病(AP)患者的比例(以记录在案的分裂情感性(SZA)障碍诊断为代表)是否在阳性、阴性和抑郁症状领域调节了CBT疗效。文献检索共识别出4457条记录,其中纳入了39项研究。SZA障碍参与者的中位数比例为17%,共有422名AP参与者。元回归显示,随着SZA障碍比例的升高,CBT对阳性症状的疗效有降低的趋势(每增加10%的AP,标准化均数差增加0.10;P = 0.12),尽管未达到统计学显著性。在阴性症状(β = +0.05;P = 0.73)或抑郁症状(β = -0.02;P = 0.78)方面未发现显著关联。所有模型的异质性都很大(I2范围为54%至80%),并且在阴性和抑郁症状中观察到漏斗图不对称,表明可能存在发表偏倚。偏倚风险评估显示了心理治疗在设盲方面预期的固有困难以及可能影响一些研究的脱落率。情感症状可能会降低CBT对精神病性障碍阳性症状的有效性,尽管研究结果未达到统计学显著性。精神病中的其他患者层面特征可能表明哪些患者能从CBT模式中获益最多。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3b81/12347526/88e8afd71140/jcm-14-05521-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验