Kaku Koji, Sato Toshiyuki, Takeuchi Jiro, Yokoyama Keiko, Yagi Soichi, Takagi Yasuhiro, Ikenouchi Maiko, Kawai Mikio, Kamikozuru Koji, Yokoyama Yoko, Takagawa Tetsuya, Tomita Toshihiko, Fukui Hirokazu, Shinzaki Shinichiro
Department of Gastroenterology, School of Medicine, Hyogo Medical University, 1-1 Mukogawa, Nishinomiya 663-8501, Hyogo, Japan.
Institute for Clinical and Translational Science, Nara Medical University, Nara 634-8522, Japan.
J Clin Med. 2025 Aug 7;14(15):5588. doi: 10.3390/jcm14155588.
Acute severe ulcerative colitis (ASUC) is often managed by tacrolimus induction therapy followed by maintenance therapy. We compared the effectiveness of ustekinumab versus vedolizumab as maintenance therapies after tacrolimus induced improvement in patients with ASUC. This single-center retrospective cohort study included patients with ASUC who received tacrolimus induction therapy followed by ustekinumab or vedolizumab between January 2018 and November 2024. The primary outcome was clinical remission at week 16. Secondary and exploratory outcomes included clinical remission at week 8, biologic persistence, and relapse risk. An inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) analysis was performed using the following covariates: male sex, prior biologics or JAK inhibitors, partial Mayo score, CRP, and albumin. Among 235 tacrolimus-treated patients, 29 received ustekinumab and 22 received vedolizumab. After IPTW adjustment, the clinical remission rates were significantly higher in the ustekinumab group at both week 8 (82.1% vs. 51.8%, = 0.02) and week 16 (85.4% vs. 36.8%, = 0.02). Biologic persistence was significantly higher in the ustekinumab group ( = 0.004), and ustekinumab significantly reduced the hazard of relapse in multivariable analyses (HR 0.42 [95% CI: 0.20-0.88], = 0.02). Ustekinumab showed greater effectiveness than vedolizumab in terms of achieving remission at 16 weeks after tacrolimus induction therapy in patients with ASUC.
急性重症溃疡性结肠炎(ASUC)通常采用他克莫司诱导治疗,随后进行维持治疗。我们比较了乌司奴单抗与维多珠单抗作为他克莫司诱导治疗后ASUC患者维持治疗的有效性。这项单中心回顾性队列研究纳入了2018年1月至2024年11月期间接受他克莫司诱导治疗后使用乌司奴单抗或维多珠单抗的ASUC患者。主要结局是第16周时的临床缓解。次要和探索性结局包括第8周时的临床缓解、生物制剂持续使用情况和复发风险。使用以下协变量进行治疗权重逆概率(IPTW)分析:男性、既往生物制剂或JAK抑制剂使用史、部分梅奥评分、CRP和白蛋白。在235例接受他克莫司治疗的患者中,29例接受了乌司奴单抗,22例接受了维多珠单抗。经过IPTW调整后,乌司奴单抗组在第8周(82.1%对51.8%,P = 0.02)和第16周(85.4%对36.8%,P = 0.02)的临床缓解率均显著更高。乌司奴单抗组的生物制剂持续使用率显著更高(P = 0.004),并且在多变量分析中,乌司奴单抗显著降低了复发风险(HR 0.42 [95% CI:0.20 - 0.88],P = 0.02)。在ASUC患者中,他克莫司诱导治疗后16周,乌司奴单抗在实现缓解方面比维多珠单抗显示出更大的有效性。