Mehta Rohtesh S, Aljawai Yosra M, Kebriaei Partow, Olson Amanda, Oran Betul, Rondon Gabriela, Rezvani Katayoun, Champlin Richard E, Shpall Elizabeth J
Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
Transplant Cell Ther. 2025 Aug 15. doi: 10.1016/j.jtct.2025.08.011.
In unrelated donor hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) with post-transplantation cyclophosphamide (PTCy), the clinical relevance and interplay between an isolated HLA-DQB1 mismatch and donor age remain unclear. We conducted a single-center retrospective analysis of 988 consecutive patients with hematologic malignancies undergoing a first unrelated donor HCT with PTCy prophylaxis between 2017 and 2024. We compared outcomes among recipients of 10/10 matched unrelated donors (MUD) (10/10-MUD; n = 854), 8/8 MUD with an isolated HLA-DQB1 mismatch (n = 47), and 7/8 mismatched unrelated donors (7/8-MMUD, n = 87). Multivariable analyses were performed using Cox proportional hazards models for cause-specific hazards for outcomes with competing risks. Outcomes included overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), non-relapse mortality (NRM), relapse, and acute and chronic graft-versus-host disease (GVHD), adjusting for relevant covariates. In multivariable analysis, there was no statistically significant difference in OS, PFS, NRM, or relapse between the three donor groups. Compared to the 10/10 MUD group, the adjusted hazard ratio (HR) for OS was 1.10 (95% CI, 0.75 to 1.61, P = .64) in the 7/8-MMUD group and 0.84 (95% CI, 0.48 to 1.48, P = .55) in the DQB1 mismatch group. Similarly, for NRM (P = .69), adjusted HRs were 1.24 (95% CI, 0.73 to 2.11) for 7/8-MMUD and 0.92 (95% CI, 0.45 to 1.89) for DQB1 mismatch. For relapse (P = .46), HRs were 0.79 (95% CI, 0.46 to 1.34) and 0.72 (95% CI, 0.34 to 1.53), respectively. Chronic GVHD risk was not significantly different (P = .21), with HRs of 1.53 (95% CI, 0.85 to 2.76) for 7/8-MMUD and 0.61 (95% CI, 0.23 to 1.64) for DQB1 mismatch. Acute GVHD risks, however, differed. The 7/8-MMUD group had a significantly higher risk of grade III to IV acute GVHD (HR = 2.91; 95% CI, 1.43 to 5.92; P = .003), whereas the DQB1 mismatch group had an increased risk of grade II to IV acute GVHD (HR = 1.63; 95% CI, 0.98 to 2.71; P = .062), though this did not reach statistical significance. Donor age, analyzed as a continuous variable, was not a significant predictor of OS, PFS, NRM, relapse, grade III to IV acute GVHD, or chronic GVHD but was associated with an increased risk of grade II to IV acute GVHD (HR = 1.02 per year; 95% CI, 1.00 to 1.03; P = .011). In this single-center study, we found no significant survival detriment associated with an isolated HLA-DQB1 mismatch, a 7/8 mismatch, or increased donor age in the PTCy setting. While a 7/8 mismatch was a significant risk factor for severe acute GVHD, and older donor age for grade II to IV acute GVHD, the impact of a DQB1 mismatch on GVHD remains uncertain. These preliminary data suggest that PTCy may mitigate the historical risks of these donor characteristics, though validation in larger cohorts is essential.
在采用移植后环磷酰胺(PTCy)的非血缘供者造血细胞移植(HCT)中,孤立的HLA - DQB1错配与供者年龄之间的临床相关性及相互作用仍不明确。我们对2017年至2024年间988例接受首次采用PTCy预防的非血缘供者HCT的血液系统恶性肿瘤患者进行了单中心回顾性分析。我们比较了10/10全相合非血缘供者(MUD)(10/10 - MUD;n = 854)、存在孤立HLA - DQB1错配的8/8 MUD(n = 47)以及7/8错配非血缘供者(7/8 - MMUD,n = 87)受者的结局。使用Cox比例风险模型对具有竞争风险的结局进行特定病因风险的多变量分析。结局包括总生存(OS)、无进展生存(PFS)、非复发死亡率(NRM)、复发以及急性和慢性移植物抗宿主病(GVHD),并对相关协变量进行了校正。在多变量分析中,三个供者组在OS、PFS、NRM或复发方面无统计学显著差异。与10/10 MUD组相比,7/8 - MMUD组OS的校正风险比(HR)为1.10(95%CI,0.75至1.61,P = 0.64),DQB1错配组为0.84(95%CI,0.48至1.48,P = 0.55)。同样,对于NRM(P = 0.69),7/8 - MMUD组的校正HR为1.24(95%CI,0.73至2.11),DQB1错配组为0.92(95%CI,0.45至1.89)。对于复发(P = 0.46),HR分别为0.79(95%CI,0.46至1.34)和0.72(95%CI,0.34至1.53)。慢性GVHD风险无显著差异(P = 0.21),7/8 - MMUD组的HR为1.53(95%CI,0.85至2.76),DQB1错配组为0.61(95%CI,0.23至1.64)。然而,急性GVHD风险有所不同。7/8 - MMUD组发生III至IV级急性GVHD的风险显著更高(HR = 2.91;95%CI,1.43至5.92;P = 0.003),而DQB1错配组发生II至IV级急性GVHD的风险增加(HR = 1.63;95%CI,0.98至2.71;P = 0.062),尽管这未达到统计学显著性。作为连续变量分析的供者年龄,不是OS、PFS、NRM、复发、III至IV级急性GVHD或慢性GVHD的显著预测因素,但与II至IV级急性GVHD风险增加相关(HR = 每年1.02;95%CI,1.00至1.03;P = 0.011)。在这项单中心研究中,我们发现在PTCy情况下,孤立的HLA - DQB1错配、7/8错配或供者年龄增加与生存无显著损害相关。虽然7/8错配是严重急性GVHD的显著危险因素,供者年龄较大是II至IV级急性GVHD的危险因素,但DQB1错配对GVHD的影响仍不确定。这些初步数据表明,PTCy可能减轻这些供者特征的既往风险,不过在更大队列中进行验证至关重要。