Suppr超能文献

培养社区对研究的接受度:通过规范化过程理论将参与研究概念化。

Nurturing Acceptance for Research in the Community: Conceptualising Engagement Towards Research Through Normalisation Process Theory.

作者信息

Turin Tanvir C, Chowdhury Nashit, Newaz Tanmoy, Raihan Mohammad M H, Rahman Nafiza, Rumana Nahid

机构信息

Department of Family Medicine, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.

Department of Community Health Sciences, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.

出版信息

Health Expect. 2025 Aug;28(4):e70356. doi: 10.1111/hex.70356.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Community-engaged research with immigrant and visible minority communities requires intentional strategies to foster acceptance, trust and sustained participation. Historically, research in marginalised communities has been extractive and externally driven, leading to mistrust and scepticism.

OBJECTIVES

To address this, we applied Normalisation Process Theory (NPT) as a guiding framework to integrate research as a meaningful, community-driven practice rather than an extractive academic exercise. The objective of this paper is to describe how NPT can illuminate the social and relational processes involved in introducing, legitimising and maintaining collaborative research practices within a community.

METHODS

Using NPT's four constructs-Coherence (establishing the 'why'), Cognitive Participation (generating the 'will'), Collective Action (carrying out the 'tasks') and Reflexive Monitoring (reflecting and adapting)-we structured a phased approach to community engagement. Our initiatives included community-focused outreach, community organisation for capacity-building and collaborative research activities, all designed to shift research from being externally imposed to community-engaged. A key challenge was achieving initial acceptance of research within the community.

RESULTS

Through intentional outreach, inclusive recruitment and participatory knowledge production, we transitioned from establishing legitimacy to building long-term, community-driven partnerships.

CONCLUSION

Our experience highlight the importance of embedding research within everyday community life, valuing local expertise and ensuring that knowledge production remains collaborative, accessible and action-oriented. This approach not only bridges the gap between academia and the community but also fosters equitable, enduring research relationships that lead to meaningful, sustainable impact.

PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION

While preparing this manuscript, we have partnered actively with community scholars and citizen researchers from the very beginning. We had regular interactions with them to get their valuable and insightful inputs in shaping our reflections. Their involvement as co-authors in this paper also provided a learning opportunity for them and facilitated them to gain insight into knowledge engagement. All authors support the greater community/citizen/public involvement in research in an equitable manner.

摘要

背景

与移民和少数族裔社区开展社区参与式研究需要有针对性的策略,以促进接纳、信任和持续参与。从历史上看,在边缘化社区开展的研究具有剥削性且由外部驱动,导致了不信任和怀疑。

目的

为解决这一问题,我们应用了规范化过程理论(NPT)作为指导框架,将研究整合为一种有意义的、由社区驱动的实践,而不是一种剥削性的学术活动。本文的目的是描述NPT如何阐明在社区内引入、使合作研究实践合法化并维持该实践所涉及的社会和关系过程。

方法

我们利用NPT的四个要素——连贯性(确立“为什么”)、认知参与(产生“意愿”)、集体行动(执行“任务”)和反思性监测(反思与调整)——构建了一种分阶段的社区参与方法。我们的举措包括以社区为重点的外展活动、能力建设的社区组织和合作研究活动,所有这些都旨在将研究从外部强加转变为社区参与。一个关键挑战是在社区内实现对研究的初步接纳。

结果

通过有意的外展、包容性招募和参与式知识生产,我们从确立合法性过渡到建立长期的、由社区驱动的伙伴关系。

结论

我们的经验凸显了将研究融入社区日常生活、重视当地专业知识并确保知识生产保持合作性、可及性和以行动为导向的重要性。这种方法不仅弥合了学术界与社区之间的差距,还促进了公平、持久的研究关系,从而带来有意义、可持续的影响。

患者或公众贡献

在撰写本手稿时,我们从一开始就积极与社区学者和公民研究人员合作。我们与他们定期互动,以获取他们在塑造我们的思考方面的宝贵且有见地的意见。他们作为共同作者参与本文也为他们提供了一个学习机会,并促进他们深入了解知识参与。所有作者都支持以公平的方式让更多社区/公民/公众参与研究。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3ddc/12358675/decba508e5b4/HEX-28-e70356-g002.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验