• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

左前降支的有创冠状动脉生理学有何不同?

How Different is Invasive Coronary Physiology in the Left Anterior Descending Artery?

作者信息

Johnson Nils P, Gould K Lance

机构信息

McGovern Medical School at UTHealth, Memorial Hermann Hospital, Houston, Texas, US.

出版信息

Methodist Debakey Cardiovasc J. 2025 Aug 12;21(4):4-13. doi: 10.14797/mdcvj.1606. eCollection 2025.

DOI:10.14797/mdcvj.1606
PMID:40822376
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12352405/
Abstract

Given the large amount of myocardium supplied by the left anterior descending (LAD) artery, it understandably receives additional scrutiny during coronary angiography. However, these same features make the interpretation of pressure wire physiology more nuanced to avoid overtreatment. This review provides case examples to underpin an extensive literature review supporting the argument that a "positive" fractional flow reserve (FFR) in the LAD needs to be approached with caution. A large hyperemic gradient, or low FFR, can arise from either a severe and focal lesion in conjunction with low flow or diffuse disease coupled with intact or normal flow. Separating these two scenarios, and the wide continuum between them, ultimately requires upstream assessment of absolute myocardial perfusion, although a pressure wire pullback can help identify diffuse patterns unsuitable for revascularization.

摘要

鉴于左前降支(LAD)动脉供血的心肌量很大,在冠状动脉造影期间对其进行额外检查是可以理解的。然而,这些相同的特征使得压力导丝生理学的解释更加微妙,以避免过度治疗。本综述提供了案例示例,以支持广泛的文献综述,该综述支持这样的观点,即对于LAD中“阳性”的血流储备分数(FFR)需要谨慎对待。大的充血梯度或低FFR可能源于严重的局灶性病变合并低血流,或者弥漫性疾病合并完整或正常血流。区分这两种情况以及它们之间的广泛连续体,最终需要对绝对心肌灌注进行上游评估,尽管压力导丝回撤有助于识别不适合血运重建的弥漫性模式。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a8a3/12352405/9d5a9a83f37d/mdcvj-21-4-1606-g3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a8a3/12352405/654dd178a4d9/mdcvj-21-4-1606-g1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a8a3/12352405/6cd9816cc96c/mdcvj-21-4-1606-g2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a8a3/12352405/9d5a9a83f37d/mdcvj-21-4-1606-g3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a8a3/12352405/654dd178a4d9/mdcvj-21-4-1606-g1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a8a3/12352405/6cd9816cc96c/mdcvj-21-4-1606-g2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a8a3/12352405/9d5a9a83f37d/mdcvj-21-4-1606-g3.jpg

相似文献

1
How Different is Invasive Coronary Physiology in the Left Anterior Descending Artery?左前降支的有创冠状动脉生理学有何不同?
Methodist Debakey Cardiovasc J. 2025 Aug 12;21(4):4-13. doi: 10.14797/mdcvj.1606. eCollection 2025.
2
Agreement of Fractional Flow Reserve Estimated by Computed Tomography With Invasively Measured Fractional Flow Reserve: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.基于计算机断层扫描的血流储备分数与有创血流储备分数的一致性:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2024 May 21;13(10):e034552. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.124.034552. Epub 2024 May 10.
3
Diagnostic performance of angiography-derived fractional flow reserve compared to pressure wire-derived fractional flow reserve: Rationale and design of MPFFR pivotal trial.与压力导丝衍生的血流储备分数相比,血管造影衍生的血流储备分数的诊断性能:MPFFR关键试验的原理与设计
Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2025 Aug;77:56-60. doi: 10.1016/j.carrev.2024.09.015. Epub 2024 Sep 24.
4
Randomized Comparison of Fractional Flow Reserve and Instantaneous Wave Free Ratio in Serial Disease.串联病变中血流储备分数与瞬时无波比值的随机对照研究
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2025 Jul 14;18(13):1617-1627. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2025.05.033.
5
Predictors of Discordance Between the Hyperemic Fractional Flow Reserve Index and the Nonhyperemic Resting Full-Cycle Ratio Index in Intermediate Coronary Lesions in a Spanish Cohort.西班牙队列中中度冠状动脉病变充血分数血流储备指数与非充血静息全周期比率指数不一致的预测因素
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2025 Aug;106(2):1282-1290. doi: 10.1002/ccd.31682. Epub 2025 Jun 11.
6
Physiological Insight Into the Discordance Between Non-Hyperemic Pressure Ratio-Guided and Fractional Flow Reserve-Guided Revascularization.关于非充血压力比值引导与血流储备分数引导的血运重建之间不一致性的生理学见解。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2025 Jul;106(1):90-104. doi: 10.1002/ccd.31517. Epub 2025 Mar 31.
7
Diagnostic Performance of Angiography-Based Vessel-Fractional Flow Reserve Compared with Various Wire-Based Physiological Assessments.基于血管造影的血管分数血流储备与各种基于导丝的生理评估的诊断性能比较。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2025 Apr 14. doi: 10.1002/ccd.31534.
8
Diagnostic Performance of Coronary Angiography Derived Computational Fractional Flow Reserve.基于冠状动脉造影的计算血流储备分数的诊断性能。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2024 Jul 2;13(13):e029941. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.123.029941. Epub 2024 Jun 21.
9
Diagnostic Accuracy of Angiography-Derived Murray Law-Based Quantitative Flow Ratio (μQFR) Versus Pressure-Derived Fractional Flow Reserve (FFR) in Moderate to Severe Calcified Coronary Lesions-The DIAMOND Study.基于血管造影的Murray定律的定量血流比(μQFR)与基于压力的血流储备分数(FFR)在中度至重度钙化冠状动脉病变中的诊断准确性——钻石研究
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2025 Jul;106(1):377-383. doi: 10.1002/ccd.31553. Epub 2025 Apr 24.
10
Pressure-Derived Indices in the Left Main Coronary Artery: Insights From Comprehensive In Vivo Hemodynamic Studies of Diseased and Unobstructed Vessels.左主干冠状动脉压力衍生指数:来自病变和无阻塞血管的全面体内血流动力学研究的见解。
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2025 Jul;18(7):e015320. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.125.015320. Epub 2025 May 12.

本文引用的文献

1
Post-PCI coronary physiology: clinical outcomes and can we optimize?
Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2025 Apr;73:91-97. doi: 10.1016/j.carrev.2024.11.013. Epub 2024 Dec 5.
2
Influence of Pathophysiologic Patterns of Coronary Artery Disease on Immediate Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Outcomes.冠状动脉疾病病理生理模式对即刻经皮冠状动脉介入治疗结局的影响。
Circulation. 2024 Aug 20;150(8):586-597. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.124.069450. Epub 2024 May 14.
3
FFR-Guided Complete or Culprit-Only PCI in Patients with Myocardial Infarction.FFR 引导的心肌梗死患者完全血运重建或罪犯病变血运重建。
N Engl J Med. 2024 Apr 25;390(16):1481-1492. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2314149. Epub 2024 Apr 8.
4
Ticagrelor or Clopidogrel Monotherapy vs Dual Antiplatelet Therapy After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Systematic Review and Patient-Level Meta-Analysis.替格瑞洛或氯吡格雷单药治疗与经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后双联抗血小板治疗:系统评价和患者水平荟萃分析。
JAMA Cardiol. 2024 May 1;9(5):437-448. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2024.0133.
5
Timing of Complete Revascularization with Multivessel PCI for Myocardial Infarction.多血管 PCI 治疗心肌梗死的完全血运重建时机。
N Engl J Med. 2023 Oct 12;389(15):1368-1379. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2307823. Epub 2023 Aug 27.
6
Complete or Culprit-Only PCI in Older Patients with Myocardial Infarction.老年心肌梗死患者的完全或罪犯病变血运重建治疗。
N Engl J Med. 2023 Sep 7;389(10):889-898. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2300468. Epub 2023 Aug 26.
7
Differential Improvement in Angina and Health-Related Quality of Life After PCI in Focal and Diffuse Coronary Artery Disease.局灶性和弥漫性冠状动脉疾病患者PCI术后心绞痛及健康相关生活质量的差异改善
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2022 Dec 26;15(24):2506-2518. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2022.09.048. Epub 2022 Nov 30.
8
Fractional flow reserve versus angiography-guided strategy in acute myocardial infarction with multivessel disease: a randomized trial.分数血流储备与血管造影引导策略在多支血管病变急性心肌梗死中的应用:一项随机试验。
Eur Heart J. 2023 Feb 7;44(6):473-484. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehac763.
9
Procedural Outcomes After Percutaneous Coronary Interventions in Focal and Diffuse Coronary Artery Disease.局灶性和弥漫性冠状动脉疾病经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后的程序结果。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2022 Dec 6;11(23):e026960. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.122.026960. Epub 2022 Nov 29.
10
Clinical Validation of a Virtual Planner for Coronary Interventions Based on Coronary CT Angiography.基于冠状动脉 CT 血管造影术的冠状动脉介入虚拟规划器的临床验证。
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2022 Jul;15(7):1242-1255. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2022.02.003. Epub 2022 Apr 13.