BACKGROUND

We aimed to assess knowledge of emergency department (ED) physicians regarding the classification and treatment of angioedema and to evaluate the impact of a training program on this knowledge base.

METHODS

A total of 11 questions about angioedema and its types were posed to ED physicians from various hospitals, either in person or via e-mail, before the implementation of an educational module on the subject (pre-test). Following a brief training period, the ED physicians were presented with the same set of questions once again (post-test). The reliability between the repeated tests were estimated using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC). Item difficulty was calculated separately for each question in both the pre-test and post-test.

RESULTS

A total of 541 ED physicians participated in the pre-test survey, and 162 of them declined to participate in the post-test survey. The remaining 379 participated in the post-test survey as well. The ICC between the repeated tests indicated a moderate level of reliability (mean ICC = 0.5; 0.42-0.57; lower and upper 95% confidence intervals). The mean item difficulty was 0.36 in the pre-test, indicating that the items had an appropriate level of difficulty. In the post-test, the mean item difficulty increased to 0.57, suggesting that the items were generally easier, likely reflecting improved knowledge or skills following the intervention. The level of knowledge regarding the clinical features of different types of angioedema was found to be inadequate. Following the training period, there was a notable increase in the number of correct answers, with a statistically significant difference (p = 0.002). Similarly, a remarkable increase was observed in the number of respondents who indicated that bradykinin-mediated-angioedema should be considered in cases of unresponsiveness to antihistamine and-corticosteroid treatment (p < 0.001). Regarding queries about hereditary angioedema (HAE), the majority of ED physicians had no prior experience in treating a patient with HAE, and only a small number were familiar with the symptoms of HAE. Following the training ED physicians demonstrated enhanced knowledge of HAE symptoms and diagnostic criteria (p < 0.001). Similarly, a notable enhancement in familiarity with HAE attack treatments was observed when the inquiries related to these treatments were compared between the pre-test and post-test phases (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

In light of the potential lethality of attacks mediated by bradykinin, a training program should include the recognition of rare types of angioedema, with a particular emphasis on HAE disease.