Tchoua Phoebe P, Patel Shreena, Starr Aviva Shira, Rairigh Richard, Smith Falon, Willis Erik A
Center for Health Promotion and Disease Prevention, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States of America.
PLoS One. 2025 Aug 18;20(8):e0323396. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0323396. eCollection 2025.
The COVID-19 pandemic disrupted oral health practices in early care education (ECE) centers. This study describes the implementation of oral health evidence-based practices (EBP) in ECE centers enrolled in the web-based Go NAPSACC program pre-, during-, and post-COVID-19 stay-at-home (SAH) orders. This repeated cross-sectional study analyzed retroactive data from three types of programs (n = 1,490), that participated in Go NAPSACC oral health modules between January 2017 and April 2024: Head Start (n = 154), family child care home (FCCH; n = 540), and center-based (n = 796). Programs that did not use the Oral Health module (n = 10,425) and had duplicate registrations (n = 91) were excluded. The analysis focused on EBP total score and percentage of EBP met scores. We found significant differences in oral health EBP total and EBP met scores between program type (p < 0.001). Head Start programs had statistically significant higher EBP total percentage scores (81.8, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 78.5, 85.2; p < 0.0001) than FCCH programs (69.5, 95% CI = 67.1, 71.8; p < 0.0001), and center-based programs (59.5, 95% CI = 57.3, 61.7). Similarly, Head Start programs had higher EBP met scores (62.0, 95% CI = 57.7, 66.3; p < 0.0001), than FCCH programs (49.7, 95% CI = 46.7, 52.7; p < 0.0001), and center-based programs (36.9, 95% CI = 34.1, 39.8). We observed no statistically significant differences among programs based on SAH order period for neither EBP total scores (period, p = 0.761; interaction between program type and period, p = 0.788) nor EBP met scores (period, p = 0.178; interaction between program type and SAH order period, p = 0.293). These findings suggest that ECE programs struggle to meet oral health EBP across the three study periods, and the observed differences across program type was not explained by SAH orders.
新冠疫情扰乱了早期儿童教育(ECE)中心的口腔健康实践。本研究描述了参与基于网络的Go NAPSACC项目的ECE中心在新冠疫情居家令发布前、期间和之后实施口腔健康循证实践(EBP)的情况。这项重复横断面研究分析了2017年1月至2024年4月期间参与Go NAPSACC口腔健康模块的三种类型项目(n = 1490)的追溯数据:开端计划(n = 154)、家庭儿童保育院(FCCH;n = 540)和中心型项目(n = 796)。未使用口腔健康模块的项目(n = 10425)和重复注册的项目(n = 91)被排除。分析重点是EBP总分和EBP达标分数的百分比。我们发现不同项目类型之间的口腔健康EBP总分和EBP达标分数存在显著差异(p < 0.001)。开端计划项目的EBP总百分比得分在统计学上显著高于FCCH项目(81.8,95%置信区间[CI] = 78.5,85.2;p < 0.0001)和中心型项目(59.5,95% CI = 57.3,61.7)。同样,开端计划项目的EBP达标分数也高于FCCH项目(62.0,95% CI = 57.7,66.3;p < 0.0001)和中心型项目(36.9,95% CI = 34.1,39.8)。我们观察到,无论是EBP总分(时期,p = 0.761;项目类型与时期之间的交互作用,p = 0.788)还是EBP达标分数(时期,p = 0.178;项目类型与新冠疫情居家令时期之间的交互作用,p = 0.293),基于居家令时期的项目之间均未观察到统计学上显著差异。这些发现表明,ECE项目在三个研究时期都难以达到口腔健康EBP的要求,且观察到的不同项目类型之间的差异无法用居家令来解释。