Wang Xiaoxia, Huang Yao, Cao Ying, Chen Huifang, Gong Xueqin, Lan Xiaosong, Zhang Jiuquan, Ye Zhaoxiang
Department of Radiology, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute & Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin's Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Key Laboratory of Breast Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin Medical University, Ministry of Education, Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin, China.
Department of Radiology, Chongqing University Cancer Hospital, Chongqing, China.
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2025 Aug 20. doi: 10.1002/jmri.70074.
With breast cancer treatment advances, accurate non-invasive methods are needed to distinguish its human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) subtypes. Recently developed time-dependent diffusion MRI (t-dMRI) has potential in characterizing cellular tissue microstructures in breast cancer. However, its role in identifying HER2 subtypes is unknown.
To investigate the feasibility of t-dMRI-based microstructural histogram parameters for characterizing properties of four HER2 subtypes in breast cancer.
Prospective.
Four hundred ninety-five participants with invasive breast cancer (18 HER2-zero, 49 -ultralow, 243 -low and 185 -positive).
FIELD STRENGTH/SEQUENCE: 3-T, oscillating gradient spin-echo (OGSE) and pulsed gradient spin-echo (PGSE) sequences for t-dMRI.
The HER2 status was categorized as HER2-zero, -ultralow, -low, or -positive by immunohistochemistry and fluorescence in situ hybridization. The t-dMRI data were fitted using the IMPULSED method. Tumors were identified on dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI and delineated on the PGSE image (b = 0 s/mm). Forty-nine histogram parameters were extracted from the tumor, including four microstructural maps (diameter, intracellular fraction, extracellular diffusivity, cellularity) and three apparent diffusion coefficient maps.
Histogram parameters were analyzed via one-way analysis of variance followed by pairwise t tests with Bonferroni correction. The Boruta method selected the significant parameters for each HER2 subtype. The predictive performance was assessed through area under the curve (AUC). A p value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Thirty-two histogram parameters showed significant differences among the four HER2 subgroups. Four models were constructed, which achieved high performance for distinguishing HER2-positive versus negative (AUC of 0.85), HER2-positive versus low (AUC of 0.87), and HER2-low versus immunohistochemistry 0 (AUC of 0.81), along with moderate performance for distinguishing HER2-zero versus -ultralow (AUC of 0.77).
Selected t-dMRI-derived histogram parameters may be applicable for identifying HER2 subtypes in breast cancer.