Kwong Jeffrey W, Miclau Katherine R, Tapp Emma, Xiao Angel X, Mulakaluri Ashley, Shapiro Lauren M
From the Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California San Francisco, CA, USA.
J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2025 Mar 12;33(17):1000-1006. doi: 10.5435/JAAOS-D-24-01062.
INTRODUCTION: Insurance type can result in disparities in access to specialist orthopaedic care. Here, we sought to quantify how insurance type affects time to surgery in patients with a distal radius fracture that needs surgical treatment. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study of patients ≥18 years with surgically managed, closed distal radius fractures was conducted. We measured the time from injury to surgery, the time from injury to clinic visit, and the time from clinic visit to surgery. Data were analyzed using linear regression models. RESULTS: We included 131 patients (69.0%) with private insurance and 56 patients (29.5%) with public insurance. The mean time from injury to surgery for the entire cohort was 12.4 ± 0.6 days. Private insurance patients had an average time from injury to surgery of 11.0 ± 0.5 days; public insurance patients had an average of 16.2 ± 1.3 days (P < 0.001). The increased time from injury to surgery for publicly insured patients was due to a 4.3-day longer (P < 0.001) time from injury to clinic visit; the time from clinic visit to surgery was similar (0.9 days, P = 0.216). In a stratified analysis, age was an effect modifier of the relationship between insurance type and time to surgery, with greater delays for younger patients. Preferred language other than English was associated with a 5.4 day longer time to surgery (P = 0.022) in a multivariate model. DISCUSSION: In patients with surgically treated distal radius fractures, public insurance was associated with a longer time to surgery, with such effect more pronounced for younger patients. Patients who spoke a language other than English also experienced greater delays. These findings warrant system-level efforts to address inequitable delays in care.
引言:保险类型可能导致在获得专业骨科护理方面存在差异。在此,我们试图量化保险类型如何影响需要手术治疗的桡骨远端骨折患者的手术时间。 方法:对18岁及以上接受手术治疗的闭合性桡骨远端骨折患者进行回顾性队列研究。我们测量了从受伤到手术的时间、从受伤到就诊的时间以及从就诊到手术的时间。使用线性回归模型对数据进行分析。 结果:我们纳入了131名(69.0%)有私人保险的患者和56名(29.5%)有公共保险的患者。整个队列从受伤到手术的平均时间为12.4±0.6天。有私人保险的患者从受伤到手术的平均时间为11.0±0.5天;有公共保险的患者平均为16.2±1.3天(P<0.001)。有公共保险的患者从受伤到手术时间增加是由于从受伤到就诊的时间延长了4.3天(P<0.001);从就诊到手术的时间相似(0.9天,P=0.216)。在分层分析中,年龄是保险类型与手术时间关系的效应修饰因素,年轻患者的延迟时间更长。在多变量模型中,非英语母语与手术时间延长5.4天相关(P=0.022)。 讨论:在接受手术治疗的桡骨远端骨折患者中,公共保险与手术时间延长相关,这种影响在年轻患者中更为明显。说非英语的患者也经历了更长的延迟。这些发现值得在系统层面努力解决护理中的不公平延迟问题。
J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2025-3-12
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015-9-25
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023-11-7
Matern Child Health J. 2024-1