Dunnion Mary, Goode Debbie, Ryan Assumpta, McIlfatrick Sonja
School of Nursing and Paramedic Science, Faculty of Life and Health Sciences, Ulster University, Derry~Londonderry, United Kingdom.
School of Nursing and Paramedic Sciences, Faculty of Life and Health Science, Ulster University, Belfast, United Kingdom.
PLoS One. 2025 Aug 22;20(8):e0313968. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0313968. eCollection 2025.
Older adults constitute a considerable number of attendances at emergency departments (EDs). Whilst many require hospital admission, a greater focus now is on admission avoidance with older adults being subsequently discharged from EDs. Little is known, however, about the experiences out of hours (OOH) when specialist older person support services are unavailable.
To explore senior health care professionals' experiences of discharging older people during out of hours from EDs.
A qualitative study involving individual semi-structured interviews was used to explore the experiences of healthcare professionals. Fourteen participants in total responded from a wide geographical spread. Data analysis was undertaken using Braun and Clarke's (2022) six-step framework for Thematic Analysis.
One overarching theme was identified focusing on risks and safety for the older person whilst being discharged OOH from the ED. Three sub-themes included "Should they stay, or should they go?", "Bright lights and noise", and "New ways of working", which included risks in discharging an older person OOH from the ED, risks in delaying discharge, and recommendations for future practice. Significant differences were reported between office hours and OOH discharge of older adults from the ED. Diversity in practice assessments, and resources available was also evident across EDs. Significant adverse consequences were identified for older adults having to stay for prolonged periods in the ED.
There have been many welcome developments in healthcare services for older people who attend and are subsequently discharged from the ED. However, further innovative practice and collaboration with senior decision makers is needed to meet the healthcare needs of a rapidly ageing population. Safe, equitable and effective discharge practice 24/7 should be a norm for all older people in every ED regardless of location. Gaps in care identified must be addressed taking cognisance of the relevant recommendations for future practice.
老年人占急诊科就诊人数的相当比例。虽然许多人需要住院治疗,但现在更关注的是避免住院,让老年人随后从急诊科出院。然而,对于非工作时间(OOH)在没有老年专科支持服务的情况下的经历,人们了解甚少。
探讨高级医疗保健专业人员在非工作时间从急诊科让老年人出院的经历。
采用一项涉及个人半结构式访谈的定性研究来探讨医疗保健专业人员的经历。共有14名参与者从广泛的地域范围做出了回应。使用布劳恩和克拉克(2022年)的主题分析六步框架进行数据分析。
确定了一个总体主题,重点关注老年人在非工作时间从急诊科出院时的风险和安全。三个子主题包括“他们该留还是该走?”、“强光和噪音”以及“新的工作方式”,其中包括非工作时间从急诊科让老年人出院的风险、延迟出院的风险以及对未来实践的建议。报告称,在办公时间和非工作时间从急诊科让老年人出院之间存在显著差异。不同急诊科在实践评估和可用资源方面也存在明显差异。确定了老年人不得不在急诊科长时间停留的重大不良后果。
对于到急诊科就诊并随后出院的老年人,医疗保健服务有了许多令人欢迎的发展。然而,需要进一步创新实践并与高级决策者合作,以满足快速老龄化人口的医疗保健需求。无论地点如何,安全、公平和有效的24/7出院实践应该成为每个急诊科所有老年人的规范。必须考虑到未来实践的相关建议,解决已发现的护理差距。