Suppr超能文献

机器人辅助膀胱切除术中体内与体外尿液改道的比较结果:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。

Comparative outcomes of intracorporeal and extracorporeal urinary diversion in robotic cystectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

作者信息

Fan Gen, Zhu Xiaole, Chen Yushui, Cai Songzhi, Li Yang, Tang Tielong

机构信息

Department of Urology/School of Clinical Medicine, North Sichuan Medical College/Affiliated Hospital of North Sichuan Medical College, No. 1, South Maoyuan Road, Shunqing District, Nanchong City, 63700, Sichuan Province, China.

出版信息

J Robot Surg. 2025 Aug 25;19(1):512. doi: 10.1007/s11701-025-02655-0.

Abstract

This study aimed to elucidate the most recent evidence regarding complications, perioperative outcomes, and pathological results associated with extracorporeal urinary diversion (ECUD) in comparison to intracorporeal urinary diversion (ICUD) during robotic-assisted radical cystectomy (RARC). A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted to facilitate this comparison. We conducted a thorough systematic review of relevant studies by systematically searching several databases, including PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science, to assess the implications of ICUD versus ECUD in the context of RARC. The examination of binary variables employed relative risk (RR) measurements, whereas weighted mean differences (WMD) served as the primary metric for evaluating continuous variable outcomes. Twenty-two studies involving 8030 patients were included, of which 3755 received ICUD and 4278 received ECUD. Baseline characteristics were similar in the two cohorts. The study showed that the ICUD cohort had a notably lower rate of severe complications in the late phase (30-90 day) [RR = 0.71, 95% CI = 0.54, 0.94, p = 0.016] than the ECUD group. Furthermore, the rate of intraoperative transfusions was notably less in ICUD, with a RR of 0.63 (95% CI 0.47, 0.84, p = 0.002). Likewise, the estimated blood loss (EBL) in the ICUD cohort was decreased, reflected by a WMD of - 131.4 (95% CI - 153.24 to - 111.03, p < 0.001). Additionally, length of stay for patients in the ICUD cohort showed a notably decrease, indicated by a WMD of - 1.87 (95% CI - 3.34, - 0.41, p = 0.004). Nonetheless, there was still no notable variation between the two cohorts regarding early (30 days) complications, mid-term (30-90 days) mild complications, rehospitalization rates, operative time (OT), postoperative venting time, tumor recurrence rates, ureteroenteric stricture (UES), and oncologic outcomes. Overall, RARC with ICUD demonstrated a greater safety profile than ECUD in terms of reduced late serious complication rates, transfusion rates, EBL, and length of hospitalization, along with similar efficacy. Although ICUD has good potential for clinical dissemination, further substantial follow-up data are required to substantiate its effectiveness.

摘要

本研究旨在阐明与机器人辅助根治性膀胱切除术(RARC)期间的体内尿流改道(ICUD)相比,体外尿流改道(ECUD)相关的并发症、围手术期结局和病理结果的最新证据。进行了一项系统评价和荟萃分析以促进这种比较。我们通过系统检索包括PubMed、Embase、Cochrane图书馆和Web of Science在内的多个数据库,对相关研究进行了全面的系统评价,以评估RARC背景下ICUD与ECUD的影响。二元变量的检验采用相对危险度(RR)测量,而加权平均差(WMD)作为评估连续变量结局的主要指标。纳入了22项涉及8030例患者的研究,其中3755例接受ICUD,4278例接受ECUD。两个队列的基线特征相似。研究表明,ICUD队列在后期(30 - 90天)的严重并发症发生率[RR = 0.71,95% CI = 0.54,0.94,p = 0.016]明显低于ECUD组。此外,ICUD的术中输血率明显更低,RR为0.63(95% CI 0.47,0.84,p = 0.002)。同样,ICUD队列的估计失血量(EBL)减少,WMD为 - 131.4(95% CI - 153.24至 - 111.03,p < 0.001)。此外,ICUD队列患者的住院时间明显缩短,WMD为 - 1.87(95% CI - 3.34, - 0.41,p = 0.004)。然而,在早期(30天)并发症、中期(30 - 90天)轻度并发症、再住院率、手术时间(OT)、术后排气时间、肿瘤复发率、输尿管肠吻合口狭窄(UES)和肿瘤学结局方面,两个队列之间仍无显著差异。总体而言,在降低晚期严重并发症发生率、输血率、EBL和住院时间方面,采用ICUD的RARC比ECUD具有更高的安全性,且疗效相似。尽管ICUD具有良好的临床推广潜力,但仍需要更多大量的随访数据来证实其有效性。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验