Suppr超能文献

中心性偏差对急诊科分诊护士的影响。

The effect of centrality bias on triage nurses in the emergency department.

作者信息

Shlenger Dor, Cohen Aya, Hochman Guy, Pachys Gal, Trotzky Daniel

机构信息

Tiomkin School of Economics, Reichman University, Herzliya, Tel Aviv, Israel.

Baruch Ivcher School of Psychology, Reichman University, Herzliya, Tel Aviv, Israel.

出版信息

SAGE Open Med. 2025 Aug 23;13:20503121251364742. doi: 10.1177/20503121251364742. eCollection 2025.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To investigate whether centrality bias is one of the contributing factors for patient mistriage in the emergency department.

METHODS

A randomized, controlled, single-blinded trial was conducted in an emergency department triage station between April 1 and November 3, 2021. Experienced triage nurses were divided into control and treatment groups. The control group triaged patients using the Canadian Triage and Acuity Scale 1-5 triage scale, and the treatment group used a four-level triage scale (created by removing level 3 from the original Canadian Triage and Acuity Scale). Neither group was exposed to the other's ranking and the control group determined the patient's actual triage ranking. The accuracy of each group's ranking was determined by triage experts. Triage nurses' levels of confidence was investigated, as was the correlation between triage ranking accuracy and confidence level.

RESULTS

After excluding 58 patients with missing data, 146 assessments were analyzed. Statistical analysis was performed to compare three different aspects of triage rankings between the nurses' groups and the control group. In the first and second analyses, accuracy levels of 49% and 68% ( = 0.003), 43% and 68% ( < 0.0001) were found for the control and experimental groups, respectively. The third aspect showed no significant differences. Within the control and experimental groups, the difference in accuracy rate at levels 2 and 5 was the most significant, with 13% and 75% ( = 0.40), 29% and 67% ( = 0.009), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Central tendency has the potential to affect the accuracy of ranking among triage nurses in the emergency department. Further research is needed.

摘要

目的

探讨集中性偏差是否为急诊科患者分诊错误的影响因素之一。

方法

于2021年4月1日至11月3日在一家急诊科分诊站进行了一项随机对照单盲试验。将经验丰富的分诊护士分为对照组和治疗组。对照组使用加拿大分诊与 acuity 量表1 - 5级分诊量表对患者进行分诊,治疗组使用四级分诊量表(通过从原始加拿大分诊与 acuity 量表中去除3级创建)。两组均未接触对方的排名,且由对照组确定患者的实际分诊排名。分诊专家确定每组排名的准确性。调查了分诊护士的信心水平,以及分诊排名准确性与信心水平之间的相关性。

结果

在排除58例数据缺失的患者后,对146次评估进行了分析。进行统计分析以比较护士组与对照组在分诊排名的三个不同方面。在第一次和第二次分析中,对照组和实验组的准确率分别为49%和68%(=0.003)、43%和68%(<0.0001)。第三个方面未显示出显著差异。在对照组和实验组中,2级和5级的准确率差异最为显著,分别为13%和75%(=0.40)、29%和67%(=0.009)。

结论

集中趋势有可能影响急诊科分诊护士排名的准确性。需要进一步研究。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b2ef/12375153/098a59a0efdb/10.1177_20503121251364742-fig1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验