Fluck Carsten
Juristische und Wirtschaftswissenschaftliche Fakultät, Juristischer Bereich - Lehrstuhl für Öffentliches Recht, Martin-Luther-Universität Halle-Wittenberg, Universitätsplatz 3-5, 06099, Halle (Saale), Deutschland.
Ophthalmologie. 2025 Aug 27. doi: 10.1007/s00347-025-02308-5.
Gene therapies offer promising approaches for the treatment of genetic diseases. With the approval of Neparvovec (Luxturna®, Novartis) in 2018, a gene therapy for the treatment of retinitis pigmentosa and Leber's congenital amaurosis in RPE65 mutations, this innovation has also reached ophthalmology practice. Despite their potential, gene therapies raise significant ethical and economic issues, particularly with regard to distributive justice, which could limit access and increase inequalities.
This article examines distributive justice from an ethical perspective, focusing on the just rationing of health resources and the affordability of gene therapies for rare diseases. The aim is to highlight areas of tension between ethical demands, economic interests and the financial sustainability of the healthcare system.
Selected literature will be reviewed to shed light on the distribution of scarce healthcare resources, potential financing models and the evaluation of appropriate pricing. In addition, challenges specific to ophthalmology are addressed.
Pay-for-performance models link costs to effectiveness, but do not address all challenges. Centralized data collection and negotiation structures increase efficiency and strengthen the position vis-à-vis manufacturers, while fund models such as the HIF promote the predictability of healthcare expenditure. In ophthalmology, questions arise regarding the prioritization of patient groups, intervention thresholds and the distribution of scarce resources, for example when treating the second eye after successful treatment of the first.
基因疗法为治疗遗传疾病提供了有前景的方法。随着2018年Neparvovec(商品名Luxturna®,诺华公司)获批,一种用于治疗RPE65基因突变导致的视网膜色素变性和莱伯先天性黑蒙的基因疗法,这一创新也已应用于眼科实践。尽管基因疗法具有潜力,但也引发了重大的伦理和经济问题,特别是在分配正义方面,这可能会限制其可及性并加剧不平等。
本文从伦理角度审视分配正义,重点关注卫生资源的合理分配以及罕见病基因疗法的可负担性。目的是突出伦理要求、经济利益与医疗保健系统财务可持续性之间的紧张关系领域。
将回顾所选文献,以阐明稀缺医疗资源的分配、潜在的融资模式以及适当定价的评估。此外,还将探讨眼科特有的挑战。
绩效付费模式将成本与有效性挂钩,但并未解决所有挑战。集中的数据收集和谈判结构提高了效率,并增强了相对于制造商的地位,而诸如健康影响基金(HIF)等基金模式则促进了医疗保健支出的可预测性。在眼科领域,出现了关于患者群体的优先排序、干预阈值以及稀缺资源分配的问题,例如在第一只眼睛成功治疗后治疗第二只眼睛时。