Shreevastava Amit K, Das Rajat S, Kailash Balkund
Anatomy, All India Institute of Medical Sciences Raebareli, Raebareli, IND.
Cureus. 2025 Jul 27;17(7):e88842. doi: 10.7759/cureus.88842. eCollection 2025 Jul.
Introduction This study compared the effectiveness of the flipped classroom model with traditional teaching methods in improving embryology understanding among first-year MBBS students in competency-based medical education. The goal was to foster a deep understanding of the subject and produce well-rounded medical professionals who can contribute to the healthcare sector. Materials and methods The study involved first-year medical undergraduates. Traditional teaching was used for five months initially, followed by the flipped classroom approach for the subsequent five months. Post-tests followed each session, with a Likert scale feedback survey involving students and faculty in the anatomy department yielding insightful results. Results Post-test scores in the flipped classroom (6.54 ± 0.87) significantly surpassed those of traditional teaching (5.94 ± 0.78) (P = 0.001). Chi-square testing revealed a noteworthy difference in post-test scores category favoring the flipped classroom (P = 0.002). Additionally, cognitive assessment demonstrated the flipped classroom's superiority in knowledge, application, and analysis (P = 0.01, P = 0.01, P = 0.003, respectively). Feedback indicated the flipped classroom's efficacy in enhancing competency, with students excelling in embryology topics. Overall, students and faculty members perceive integrating the flipped classroom into the curriculum positively. This strengthens the fact that the model is more effective than traditional teaching methods in improving embryology comprehension among first-year MBBS students. Conclusion The findings suggest that implementing this method can improve students' knowledge, application, and analytical skills in every subject. These results have positive implications for medical education, reinforcing knowledge acquisition with far better understanding and thus enhancing the analytical skills for efficient application.
引言 本研究比较了翻转课堂模式与传统教学方法在基于能力的医学教育中提高一年级医学学士学生胚胎学理解能力方面的有效性。目标是培养对该学科的深入理解,并培养出全面发展的医学专业人员,使其能够为医疗保健部门做出贡献。
材料与方法 该研究涉及一年级医学本科生。最初使用传统教学法五个月,随后五个月采用翻转课堂教学法。每次课程后进行后测,通过解剖学系学生和教师参与的李克特量表反馈调查得出了有见地的结果。
结果 翻转课堂的后测成绩(6.54±0.87)显著超过传统教学的成绩(5.94±0.78)(P = 0.001)。卡方检验显示后测成绩类别存在显著差异,有利于翻转课堂(P = 0.002)。此外,认知评估表明翻转课堂在知识、应用和分析方面具有优势(分别为P = 0.01、P = 0.01、P = 0.003)。反馈表明翻转课堂在提高能力方面的有效性,学生在胚胎学主题方面表现出色。总体而言,学生和教师对将翻转课堂纳入课程持积极看法。这进一步证明了该模式在提高一年级医学学士学生胚胎学理解能力方面比传统教学方法更有效。
结论 研究结果表明,实施这种方法可以提高学生在各个学科的知识、应用和分析技能。这些结果对医学教育具有积极意义,通过更好的理解加强知识获取,从而提高有效应用的分析技能。