Suppr超能文献

癌症疲劳量表(CFS)在英国人群中的验证。

Validation of the cancer fatigue scale (CFS) in a UK population.

作者信息

Robinson C, Feder G, Huntley A L, Ramsay J, Varsani D, Gangahar D, Kröz M

机构信息

Centre for Evaluation and Methods, Pragmatic Clinical Trials Unit, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK.

Centre for Academic Primary Care, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.

出版信息

BMC Cancer. 2025 Aug 28;25(1):1394. doi: 10.1186/s12885-025-14829-y.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Cancer-related fatigue is one of the most common symptoms in patients with cancer. Fatigue reduces health-related quality of life. The Cancer Fatigue Scale (CFS) is a brief instrument that captures the multidimensional nature of fatigue with robust validity. The original scale was developed/validated with Japanese cancer patients. It was our aim to report the psychometric properties of an English translation of the CFS.

METHODS

This cross-sectional study was conducted between February-October 2008 in London, UK. Three groups were recruited: cancer patients (index group), diabetic patients (chronic disease control group), and a healthy control group. All participants completed a questionnaire on recruitment and a subset were retested at 2-8 weeks. Reliability was assessed with analysis of internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha), homogeneity (item-total correlations) and test-retest reliability. Construct validity was assessed with inter-subscale correlations. To assess convergent validity, the correlations between the CFS and FNS, EORTC - QLQ C30, and HADS were examined with Spearman Rank correlation coefficients. The discriminant validity was determined by the known group method.

RESULTS

160 participants were recruited: 60 cancer and 50 diabetes patients, and 50 healthy patients. Cronbach's alphas for the total scale and all three subscales (range 0.83,0.94) were all above the 0.70 criterion suggested for group comparisons thus the CFS showed excellent internal consistency. Homogeneity measures all fulfilled the 0.20 criterion (range 0.53-0.84). Combining the three groups, all test-retest correlations for the CFS and its subscales were above 0.7. Physical and affective subscales showed 100% scaling success. Both scores and sub-scores for the CFS correlated positively (p < 0.001) with FNS and HADS depression and anxiety subscales. The CFS correlated positively (p < 0.001) with all but one item of the EORTC-QLQ C30.

CONCLUSIONS

This evaluation of the measurement properties of the CFS-English shows that it is a reliable and valid tool for assessing key dimensions of cancer-related fatigue.

摘要

背景

癌症相关疲劳是癌症患者最常见的症状之一。疲劳会降低与健康相关的生活质量。癌症疲劳量表(CFS)是一种简短的工具,能够有效反映疲劳的多维度特性。该量表最初是针对日本癌症患者开发并验证的。我们旨在报告CFS英文译本的心理测量特性。

方法

这项横断面研究于2008年2月至10月在英国伦敦进行。招募了三组人群:癌症患者(指标组)、糖尿病患者(慢性病对照组)和健康对照组。所有参与者在招募时均完成了一份问卷,部分参与者在2至8周后进行了重新测试。通过分析内部一致性(Cronbach's α)、同质性(项目总分相关性)和重测信度来评估信度。通过分量表间的相关性评估结构效度。为评估收敛效度,用Spearman等级相关系数检验CFS与疲劳严重程度量表(FNS)、欧洲癌症研究与治疗组织生活质量核心问卷(EORTC-QLQ C30)及医院焦虑抑郁量表(HADS)之间的相关性。通过已知分组法确定区分效度。

结果

共招募了160名参与者:60名癌症患者、50名糖尿病患者和50名健康受试者。总量表及所有三个分量表的Cronbach's α系数(范围为0.83至0.94)均高于建议用于组间比较的0.70标准,因此CFS显示出良好的内部一致性。同质性测量均满足0.20标准(范围为0.53至0.84)。综合三组来看,CFS及其分量表的所有重测相关性均高于0.7。身体和情感分量表显示出100%的量表成功度。CFS的得分和子得分与FNS以及HADS抑郁和焦虑子量表均呈正相关(p < 0.001)。CFS与EORTC-QLQ C30除一项外的所有项目均呈正相关(p < 0.001)。

结论

对CFS英文译本测量特性的评估表明,它是评估癌症相关疲劳关键维度的可靠且有效的工具。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验