Suppr超能文献

联合反向全肩关节置换术与胸大肌转移治疗肩袖关节病的临床疗效:一项初步研究。

Clinical outcome of combined reverse total shoulder arthroplasty combined with pectoralis major transfer for rotator cuff arthropathy: a preliminary study.

作者信息

Baek Chang Hee, Kim Bo Taek, Kim Jung Gon, Lim Chaemoon, Miranda Luis Alfredo, Kim Seung Jin

机构信息

Yeosu Baek Hospital, Yeosu, Republic of Korea.

Hospital Cima Hermosillo, Sonora, Mexico.

出版信息

Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2025 Aug 30;35(1):369. doi: 10.1007/s00590-025-04455-6.

Abstract

PURPOSE

Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) is promising treatment option for rotator cuff tear arthropathy (CTA), but internal rotation (IR) deficits can arise in patients with irreparable subscapularis tears. The present study reports (1) the early clinical outcomes of RTSA combined with pectoralis major (PM) transfer in patients with CTA and irreparable subscapularis tears and (2) compares these outcomes with those of RTSA without subscapularis repair, with a focus on addressing IR deficiencies and enhancing overall shoulder function.

METHODS

From November 2022 to May 2023, patients who underwent RTSA with PM transfer were reviewed. For comparison, patients who underwent RTSA without subscapularis repair between November 2019 and June 2022 were also included. The inclusion criteria consisted of CTA with severe subscapularis tears, classified as Lafosse grade ≥ 4, and poor subscapularis muscle quality, defined by Goutallier fatty infiltration grade  ≥ 3. Clinical outcomes were assessed using the VAS, Constant, ASES, UCLA, and SANE, range of motion (ROM) and strength. Radiologic evaluations including radiography and MRI were performed. Patients with less than one year of follow-up or lost to final clinical assessment were excluded.

RESULTS

After excluding one patient, 22 patients who underwent RTSA with PM transfer were included (mean age: 73.8 ± 6.0 years; follow-up: 16.7 ± 2.1 months). In the comparison group, 55 patients underwent RTSA without subscapularis repair (mean age: 73.6 ± 6.3 years; follow-up: 17.9 ± 3.2 months). For both groups, significant improvements were seen in VAS, Constant, ASES, UCLA, and SANE scores (P < .001), as well as ROM in forward elevation, abduction, and internal rotation at the back. Both groups showed comparable preoperative characteristics and similar postoperative improvements in clinical scores and ROM. However, the PM transfer group demonstrated more frequent reversal of subscapularis-specific tests and significantly greater strength in forward elevation, abduction, and IR at the side.

CONCLUSION

RTSA with PM transfer can significantly alleviate pain and improve shoulder function in patients with CTA and irreparable subscapularis tears. Compared to the group without subscapularis repair, the RTSA with PM transfer group demonstrated more frequent reversal of subscapularis-specific tests and significantly greater strength in forward elevation, abduction, and IR at the side.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV; retrospective; case series.

摘要

目的

反式全肩关节置换术(RTSA)是治疗肩袖撕裂性关节病(CTA)的一种有前景的治疗选择,但对于不可修复的肩胛下肌撕裂患者,可能会出现内旋(IR)功能障碍。本研究报告了(1)RTSA联合胸大肌(PM)转移治疗CTA合并不可修复肩胛下肌撕裂患者的早期临床结果,以及(2)将这些结果与未进行肩胛下肌修复的RTSA患者的结果进行比较,重点是解决IR功能缺陷并增强整体肩部功能。

方法

回顾2022年11月至2023年5月接受RTSA联合PM转移的患者。为作比较,还纳入了2019年11月至2022年6月接受未进行肩胛下肌修复的RTSA患者。纳入标准包括CTA合并严重肩胛下肌撕裂,Lafosse分级≥4级,以及肩胛下肌肌肉质量差,由Goutallier脂肪浸润分级≥3级定义。使用视觉模拟评分法(VAS)、Constant评分、美国肩肘外科协会(ASES)评分、加州大学洛杉矶分校(UCLA)评分和肩关节功能评分(SANE)、活动范围(ROM)和力量来评估临床结果。进行包括X线摄影和磁共振成像(MRI)在内的影像学评估。排除随访时间少于一年或未进行最终临床评估的患者。

结果

排除1例患者后,纳入22例接受RTSA联合PM转移的患者(平均年龄:73.8±6.0岁;随访时间:16.7±2.1个月)。在比较组中,55例患者接受了未进行肩胛下肌修复的RTSA(平均年龄:73.6±6.3岁;随访时间:17.9±3.2个月)。两组患者的VAS、Constant、ASES、UCLA和SANE评分均有显著改善(P<0.001),前屈、外展和背部内旋的ROM也有改善。两组术前特征相当,临床评分和ROM术后改善情况相似。然而,PM转移组肩胛下肌特异性试验的逆转更为频繁,前屈、外展和体侧内旋的力量明显更大。

结论

RTSA联合PM转移可显著减轻CTA合并不可修复肩胛下肌撕裂患者的疼痛并改善肩部功能。与未进行肩胛下肌修复的组相比,RTSA联合PM转移组肩胛下肌特异性试验的逆转更为频繁,前屈、外展和体侧内旋的力量明显更大。

证据水平

IV级;回顾性;病例系列。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验