Zuo Xinyi, Chen Yifang
School of Social Work, University of Michigan, MI, Ann Arbor, Michigan, 48109, USA.
Brown School of Social Work, Washington University in St. Louis, MO, St. Louis, 63130, USA.
BMC Psychol. 2025 Aug 30;13(1):989. doi: 10.1186/s40359-025-03223-9.
Impaired Activities of Daily Living (ADL) can have a negative impact on the psychological well-being of older adults. This study categorises ADL into Basic Activities of Daily Living (BADL) and Instrumental Activities of Daily Living (IADL). By utilising nationally representative cross-sectional data, we explore the association between ADL and BADL limitations and depressive symptoms among the elderly population in China. In addition, this study explored the relationships between BADL, IADL and depression risk in elderly people at the individual and provincial levels and in rural and urban subgroups.
The China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study(CHARLS) survey used a multistage probability‒proportional‒to-size (PPS) sampling technique. Province-level socioeconomic characteristics were merged with microdata for respondents over 60 years of age from the 2020 China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study (CHARLS 2020) Wave 5 (n = 10,036) by the author. The respondents were asked whether their BADL and IADL were limited. The risk of depression was assessed using the 10-item Centre for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale (CES-D 10). The chi-squared test was used to explore whether having a disability that limits BADL and IADL was associated with mental health status. A binary logistic regression model was used to evaluate this association further after controlling for confounding factors.
Overall, 27.5% (2759/10036) and 25.7% (2776/10036) of the participants over 60 years of age were limited in their BADL and IADL, respectively. Regression analyses revealed that older adults whose BADL were not limited (OR = 1.942, 95% CI: 1.638-2.303, P <.001) and whose IADL were not limited (OR = 1.775, 95% CI: 1.485-2.122, P <.001) had a lower risk of depression than older adults whose BADL and IADL were limited. In addition, older adults who were female (P <.001), were 60-69 years (P <.005), had a partner (P <.001), were literate (P <.001), lived in a rural area (P <.001), had a retirement pension (P <.001), had three or more children (P <.001), did not have any chronic diseases (P <.001), had a fair SRH score (P <.001), drank alcohol (P <.001), exercised (P <.005), did not participate in social activities (P <.001), or had an above average per capita household consumption (P <.001) lived in provinces with the first quartile of GDP per capita (P <.001) and lived in provinces with the second quartile of the number of beds in medical institutions per 10,000 persons (P <.001) were more likely to experience depressive symptoms, while smoking had no effect. In a binary logistic regression, older adults who were single (OR = 0.669, 95% CI = 0.551, 0.812), illiterate (OR = 0.646, 95% CI = 0.504, 0.828), living in rural areas (OR = 1.485, 95% CI = 1.270, 1.735), without retirement pensions (OR = 0.671, 95% CI = 0.582, 0.819) and with very bad SRH scores (OR = 0.411, 95% CI = 0.311, 0.544) had a greater risk of depressive symptoms. In the binary logistic regression analysis of the urban and rural subgroups separately, the results indicated that old people whose BADL or IADL were not limited were associated with a risk of depression, especially rural (P <.001) and urban (P <.001) participants.
The present study provides evidence of an association between BADL, IADL and depression in older Chinese adults. This study revealed that individuals with limited BADL and limited IADL were predominantly depressed older adults. Binary logistic regression models suggested that disabilities limiting BADL and IADL were more likely to be associated with depressive symptoms in rural Chinese older adults. Findings underscore the need for targeted rural interventions (e.g., subsidised mobility aids and caregiver training) to mitigate depression risk.
日常生活活动能力受损会对老年人的心理健康产生负面影响。本研究将日常生活活动分为基本日常生活活动(BADL)和工具性日常生活活动(IADL)。通过使用具有全国代表性的横断面数据,我们探讨了中国老年人群中日常生活活动与BADL限制及抑郁症状之间的关联。此外,本研究还在个体和省级层面以及农村和城市亚组中探讨了BADL、IADL与老年人抑郁风险之间的关系。
中国健康与养老追踪调查(CHARLS)采用多阶段概率与规模成比例(PPS)抽样技术。作者将省级社会经济特征与2020年中国健康与养老追踪调查(CHARLS 2020)第5轮中60岁以上受访者的微观数据(n = 10,036)进行了合并。受访者被问及他们的BADL和IADL是否受限。使用10项流行病学研究中心抑郁量表(CES-D 10)评估抑郁风险。采用卡方检验探讨限制BADL和IADL的残疾是否与心理健康状况相关。在控制混杂因素后,使用二元逻辑回归模型进一步评估这种关联。
总体而言,60岁以上的参与者中,分别有27.5%(2759/10036)和25.7%(2776/10036)的BADL和IADL受限。回归分析显示,BADL不受限(OR = 1.942,95% CI:1.638 - 2.303,P <.001)和IADL不受限(OR = 1.775,95% CI:1.485 - 2.122,P <.001)的老年人比BADL和IADL受限的老年人患抑郁症的风险更低。此外,女性(P <.001)、60 - 69岁(P <.005)、有伴侣(P <.001)、识字(P <.001)、居住在农村地区(P <.001)、有退休养老金(P <.001)、有三个或更多子女(P <.001)、没有任何慢性病(P <.001)、自我健康评价得分中等(P <.001)、饮酒(P <.001)、锻炼(P <.005)、不参加社交活动(P <.001)或人均家庭消费高于平均水平(P <.001),且生活在人均GDP处于第一四分位数的省份(P <.001)以及每万人医疗机构床位数处于第二四分位数的省份(P <.001)的老年人更容易出现抑郁症状,而吸烟没有影响。在二元逻辑回归中,单身(OR = 0.669,95% CI = 0.551,0.812)、文盲(OR = 0.646,95% CI = 0.504,0.828)、居住在农村地区(OR = 1.485,95% CI = 1.270,1.735)、没有退休养老金(OR = 0.671,95% CI = 0.582,0.819)以及自我健康评价得分非常差(OR = 0.411,95% CI = 0.311,0.544)的老年人患抑郁症状的风险更大。在分别对城乡亚组进行的二元逻辑回归分析中,结果表明BADL或IADL不受限的老年人与抑郁风险相关,尤其是农村(P <.001)和城市(P <.001)参与者。
本研究提供了中国老年成年人中BADL、IADL与抑郁之间存在关联的证据。本研究表明,BADL和IADL受限的个体主要是抑郁的老年人。二元逻辑回归模型表明,限制BADL和IADL的残疾在中国农村老年人中更有可能与抑郁症状相关。研究结果强调了需要有针对性的农村干预措施(如补贴移动辅助设备和护理人员培训)来降低抑郁风险。