• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

埃及全民医保覆盖下患者为改善医疗质量的支付意愿。

Patients' willingness to pay for health care quality improvement under universal healthcare coverage in Egypt.

作者信息

Rozza Hebatullah H, Elhoseny Taghareed A, Abbas Safaa H, Mosallam Rasha A

机构信息

High Institute of Public Health, Alexandria University, Alexandria, Egypt.

Alexandria Clinical Research Administration, Alexandria Health Affairs Directorate, Alexandria, Egypt.

出版信息

J Egypt Public Health Assoc. 2025 Sep 2;100(1):15. doi: 10.1186/s42506-025-00195-x.

DOI:10.1186/s42506-025-00195-x
PMID:40892195
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12405145/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

In economics, the word "willingness to pay" refers to the highest amount that an individual would be willing to pay, give up, or exchange to obtain goods or services or to avoid something undesirable. It can be applied in healthcare as a way to evaluate the worth of improving the quality of health services. This study aims to assess patients' willingness to pay (WTP) for healthcare quality improvement among hospitalized patients in two hospitals in Egypt.

METHODS

Four-hundred and twenty-six patients were asked to provide a rating for different quality attributes. Patients were presented with a hypothetical scenario and asked about their WTP for a monthly insurance premium to benefit from improving each quality attribute. WTP was elicited using the payment card (PC) response format.

RESULTS

Fifty-two percent of studied patients were not willing to pay to improve healthcare quality attributes. Fifty percent of those who were willing to pay were certain to pay. The most commonly stated reasons for unwillingness to pay were "being governmental responsibility" and "household cannot afford" (43% and 36.8%, respectively). Patients were willing to pay the highest amount of money to improve the quality attributes "competence," followed by "outcome" and "doctor-patient relationship" (491.03, 465, and 423 LE, respectively). For all quality attributes, except for waiting time and availability of supplies and equipment, the amount of money the patients were willing to pay increased significantly as the perceived quality of that attribute reduced. Advancing age had a significant negative association with WTP (p = 0.002). Also, advancement in education was associated with significantly higher WTP (p < 0.001). Those with health expenditures ranging from 2000 to < 6000 LE per month were 3.38 times more willing to pay than those with health expenditures ranging from 200 to 1000 LE (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

WTP for quality improvement among study participants was low, being the lowest among the elderly and lower-educated individuals. Community financing should not be a method for funding quality improvements except for a few quality attributes such as doctor-patient communication and increased doctor competence. This should be coupled with clear exemption criteria for those unable to pay.

摘要

背景

在经济学中,“支付意愿”一词指的是个人为获得商品或服务、放弃或交换物品以避免不良事物而愿意支付的最高金额。它可应用于医疗保健领域,作为评估改善卫生服务质量价值的一种方式。本研究旨在评估埃及两家医院住院患者对改善医疗质量的支付意愿(WTP)。

方法

426名患者被要求对不同的质量属性进行评分。向患者呈现一个假设情景,并询问他们为每月保险费支付的意愿,以便从改善每个质量属性中受益。使用支付卡(PC)反应格式引出支付意愿。

结果

52%的研究患者不愿意为改善医疗质量属性付费。愿意付费的患者中有50%确定会支付。最常提及的不愿付费的原因是“是政府的责任”和“家庭负担不起”(分别为43%和36.8%)。患者愿意支付最高金额以改善“能力”这一质量属性,其次是“结果”和“医患关系”(分别为491.03埃及镑、465埃及镑和423埃及镑)。对于所有质量属性,除了等待时间以及物资和设备的可用性外,随着患者对该属性感知质量的降低,他们愿意支付的金额显著增加。年龄增长与支付意愿呈显著负相关(p = 0.002)。此外,教育程度的提高与显著更高的支付意愿相关(p < 0.001)。每月医疗支出在2000至<6000埃及镑之间的患者比医疗支出在200至1000埃及镑之间的患者愿意支付的可能性高3.38倍(p < 0.001)。

结论

研究参与者对质量改善的支付意愿较低,在老年人和受教育程度较低的个体中最低。除了少数质量属性,如医患沟通和医生能力提高外,社区融资不应作为为质量改善提供资金的方法。这应与针对无力支付者的明确豁免标准相结合。

相似文献

1
Patients' willingness to pay for health care quality improvement under universal healthcare coverage in Egypt.埃及全民医保覆盖下患者为改善医疗质量的支付意愿。
J Egypt Public Health Assoc. 2025 Sep 2;100(1):15. doi: 10.1186/s42506-025-00195-x.
2
Prescription of Controlled Substances: Benefits and Risks管制药品的处方:益处与风险
3
Sexual Harassment and Prevention Training性骚扰与预防培训
4
Intravenous magnesium sulphate and sotalol for prevention of atrial fibrillation after coronary artery bypass surgery: a systematic review and economic evaluation.静脉注射硫酸镁和索他洛尔预防冠状动脉搭桥术后房颤:系统评价与经济学评估
Health Technol Assess. 2008 Jun;12(28):iii-iv, ix-95. doi: 10.3310/hta12280.
5
Adefovir dipivoxil and pegylated interferon alfa-2a for the treatment of chronic hepatitis B: a systematic review and economic evaluation.阿德福韦酯与聚乙二醇化干扰素α-2a治疗慢性乙型肝炎:系统评价与经济学评估
Health Technol Assess. 2006 Aug;10(28):iii-iv, xi-xiv, 1-183. doi: 10.3310/hta10280.
6
Willingness to Pay for Improved Quality of Services from Informal Health Providers in Urban Slums in Nigeria.尼日利亚城市贫民窟中为改善非正规医疗服务提供者的服务质量而支付费用的意愿。
Pharmacoecon Open. 2025 Aug 27. doi: 10.1007/s41669-025-00597-9.
7
Falls prevention interventions for community-dwelling older adults: systematic review and meta-analysis of benefits, harms, and patient values and preferences.社区居住的老年人跌倒预防干预措施:系统评价和荟萃分析的益处、危害以及患者的价值观和偏好。
Syst Rev. 2024 Nov 26;13(1):289. doi: 10.1186/s13643-024-02681-3.
8
Home treatment for mental health problems: a systematic review.心理健康问题的居家治疗:一项系统综述
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(15):1-139. doi: 10.3310/hta5150.
9
Public preferences for health and non-health outcomes of Universal Basic Income and alternative income-based policies: A mixed-method feasibility study.公众对普遍基本收入和其他基于收入的政策的健康与非健康结果的偏好:一项混合方法可行性研究。
Public Health Res (Southampt). 2025 Jul 30:1-26. doi: 10.3310/ALDS8846.
10
The clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of cardiac resynchronisation (biventricular pacing) for heart failure: systematic review and economic model.心脏再同步治疗(双心室起搏)用于心力衰竭的临床疗效及成本效益:系统评价与经济学模型
Health Technol Assess. 2007 Nov;11(47):iii-iv, ix-248. doi: 10.3310/hta11470.

本文引用的文献

1
Willingness to pay for National Health Insurance Services and Associated Factors in Africa and Asia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.非洲和亚洲对国家健康保险服务的支付意愿及相关因素:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Front Public Health. 2024 Apr 19;12:1390937. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1390937. eCollection 2024.
2
Willingness to pay for social health insurance among public civil servants: A cross-sectional study in Dessie City Administration, North-East Ethiopia.公众公务员对社会医疗保险的支付意愿:埃塞俄比亚东北部德西市行政部门的一项横断面研究。
Front Public Health. 2022 Jul 19;10:920502. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.920502. eCollection 2022.
3
Effect of hospital attributes on patient preference among outpatient attendants in Wolaita Zone, Southern Ethiopia: discrete choice experiment study.
医院属性对埃塞俄比亚南部沃莱塔地区门诊就诊者的患者偏好的影响:离散选择实验研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 May 17;22(1):661. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-07874-x.
4
Determinants of willingness to pay for health services: a systematic review of contingent valuation studies.支付意愿影响因素的研究:基于条件价值评估法的系统综述
Eur J Health Econ. 2022 Dec;23(9):1455-1482. doi: 10.1007/s10198-022-01437-x. Epub 2022 Feb 15.
5
Purchasing health services under the Egypt's new Universal Health Insurance law: What are the implications for universal health coverage?在埃及新的全民健康保险法下购买医疗服务:这对全民健康覆盖有何影响?
Int J Health Plann Manage. 2022 Mar;37(2):619-631. doi: 10.1002/hpm.3354. Epub 2021 Nov 1.
6
Estimating Attribute-Specific Willingness-to-Pay Values from a Health Care Contingent Valuation Study: A Best-Worst Choice Approach.从医疗保健条件价值评估研究中估计属性特定的支付意愿值:最佳最差选择方法。
Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2020 Feb;18(1):97-107. doi: 10.1007/s40258-019-00522-2.
7
Estimating Willingness to Pay for an Improved Service Delivery to Patients Referring Namazi Hospital Chemical Therapy Ward in Iran Using Contingent Valuation.运用条件价值评估法估算伊朗纳马齐医院化疗病房患者为改善服务支付的意愿
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2018 Jul 27;19(7):1817-1823. doi: 10.22034/APJCP.2018.19.7.1817.
8
Willingness to pay for improved public health care services in Saudi Arabia: a contingent valuation study among heads of Saudi households.沙特阿拉伯民众对改善公共医疗服务意愿的支付意愿:沙特家庭户主的条件价值评估研究。
Health Econ Policy Law. 2020 Jan;15(1):72-93. doi: 10.1017/S1744133118000191. Epub 2018 Jun 4.
9
Does social trust increase willingness to pay taxes to improve public healthcare? Cross-sectional cross-country instrumental variable analysis.社会信任是否会提高人们为改善公共医疗保健而纳税的意愿?跨国横截面工具变量分析。
Soc Sci Med. 2017 Sep;189:25-34. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2017.07.023. Epub 2017 Jul 29.
10
The impact of the design of payment scales on the willingness to pay for health gains.支付量表设计对健康收益支付意愿的影响。
Eur J Health Econ. 2017 Jul;18(6):743-760. doi: 10.1007/s10198-016-0825-y. Epub 2016 Sep 13.