Anniballi Fabrizio, Purgatorio Chiara, Serio Annalisa, Scalfaro Concetta, Taglieri Silvia, Paparella Antonello
National Reference Centre for Botulism, Department of Food Safety, Nutrition and Veterinary Public Health, Istituto Superiore di Sanità, Rome, Italy.
Department of Bioscience and Technology for Food, Agriculture and Environment, University of Teramo, Teramo, Italy.
Front Microbiol. 2025 Aug 22;16:1643608. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2025.1643608. eCollection 2025.
Essential oils (EOs) hold significant potential as antimicrobials in food, due to their high concentration of active phenolic compounds. These compounds can target bacterial cells through various mechanisms, such as membrane disruption, inhibition, and interference in virulence factors, affecting microorganisms at a genomic level. and are key foodborne bacteria that could be managed using these natural preservatives. The present study investigated the effects of stress induced by applying and subsp. EOs on genetic modifications in 11 and 58C strains isolated from shelf-stable gnocchi, through their gene expression analysis by quantitative real-time RT-PCR. Sublethal EO concentrations were tested, at increasing time intervals (6, 12, 18, 24, and 48 h). Most of the genes were downregulated at 6 h, indicating that the stressful situation prolonged the lag phase. Only for both and , and and for were upregulated after 6 h, suggesting an attempt to restore cellular communication and repair membrane damage. The gene was the most significant in the stress response of . Conversely, responded through different mechanisms, primarily driven by the and genes, illustrating the role of virulence mechanisms in its stress response. In both strains, the genes were generally more upregulated at a higher concentration of EO (0.58 mg/mL), which was more stimulating than at 0.29 mg/mL. Moreover, the two EOs elicited variable stress responses, which implies different cellular mechanisms and genes in the same microorganism. Therefore, the outcomes of this study suggest that the action of the two EOs mainly influenced cell membrane integrity and mechanisms, with differences in the genes involved for the two species and the two EOs.
由于富含高浓度的活性酚类化合物,香精油(EOs)在食品中作为抗菌剂具有巨大潜力。这些化合物可通过多种机制作用于细菌细胞,如破坏细胞膜、抑制作用以及干扰毒力因子,在基因组水平上影响微生物。[具体细菌名称1]和[具体细菌名称2]是可使用这些天然防腐剂进行控制的关键食源细菌。本研究通过定量实时RT-PCR分析从货架稳定的意大利团子中分离出的[具体细菌名称1] 11株和[具体细菌名称2] 58C株的基因表达,研究了施加[具体香精油名称1]和[具体香精油名称2]亚种EOs所诱导的应激对其基因修饰的影响。在不同时间间隔(6、12、18、24和48小时)测试了亚致死浓度的EOs。大多数基因在6小时时下调,表明应激状态延长了迟缓期。仅[具体基因名称1]在[具体细菌名称1]和[具体细菌名称2]中,以及[具体基因名称2]在[具体细菌名称2]中在6小时后上调,表明试图恢复细胞通讯并修复膜损伤。[具体基因名称3]基因在[具体细菌名称1]的应激反应中最为显著。相反,[具体细菌名称2]通过不同机制做出反应,主要由[具体基因名称4]和[具体基因名称5]基因驱动,说明了毒力机制在其应激反应中的作用。在两种菌株中,基因通常在较高浓度的EO(0.58 mg/mL)下上调幅度更大,该浓度比0.29 mg/mL更具刺激性。此外,两种EOs引发了不同的应激反应,这意味着同一微生物中存在不同的细胞机制和基因。因此,本研究结果表明,两种EOs的作用主要影响细胞膜完整性和[具体机制名称]机制,两种物种和两种EOs所涉及的基因存在差异。