Bacaro Valeria, De Lise Francesca, Natale Vincenzo, Tonetti Lorenzo, Crocetti Elisabetta
Department of Psychology "Renzo Canestrari", University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Int J Psychol. 2025 Oct;60(5):e70108. doi: 10.1002/ijop.70108.
Chronotype is the preference for sleep and activity timing, differentiating individuals into morning (i.e., waking and sleeping early), evening (i.e., preferring later sleep patterns) and intermediate (i.e., falling between these extremes) types. Adolescents' chronotype has been linked to school performance, but its connection to the development of their educational identity has been overlooked. A stable educational identity involves the interplay of three processes: commitment (i.e., identification with educational choices), in-depth exploration (i.e., exploring and reflecting on commitments) and reconsideration of commitment (i.e., questioning current commitments and seeking alternatives). This longitudinal study investigates whether adolescents' chronotypes can be associated with trajectories of educational identity processes and how the latter may mediate the link between adolescents' chronotypes and school performance. The study followed 1156 adolescents (M = 15.69, SD = 1.20; 51.65% females) over four assessments spanning 1 year. Multigroup analyses showed that adolescents with an evening chronotype reported lower initial levels of educational commitment and in-depth exploration, coupled with higher reconsideration of commitment than adolescents with a morning chronotype. Additionally, a mediating effect of in-depth exploration was found in the link between chronotype and school performance. This study highlights the detrimental role of evening chronotype in educational identity development.
昼夜节律类型是指对睡眠和活动时间的偏好,据此可将个体分为早起型(即早睡早起)、晚睡型(即偏好较晚的睡眠模式)和中间型(即介于这两种极端类型之间)。青少年的昼夜节律类型与学业成绩有关,但其与青少年教育身份发展的联系却被忽视了。稳定的教育身份涉及三个过程的相互作用:承诺(即认同教育选择)、深入探索(即探索并反思承诺)以及对承诺的重新考虑(即质疑当前的承诺并寻求其他选择)。这项纵向研究调查了青少年的昼夜节律类型是否与教育身份形成过程的轨迹相关,以及后者如何在青少年的昼夜节律类型与学业成绩之间起中介作用。该研究对1156名青少年(平均年龄M = 15.69,标准差SD = 1.20;女性占51.65%)进行了为期1年的四次评估。多组分析表明,与早起型青少年相比,晚睡型青少年报告的教育承诺和深入探索的初始水平较低,而对承诺的重新考虑程度较高。此外,研究发现深入探索在昼夜节律类型与学业成绩之间的联系中起中介作用。这项研究突出了晚睡型昼夜节律在教育身份发展中的不利作用。