Vazão Adriana, Miguel Gonçalves Carolina, Martins André, Ferreira Carvalho Mariana, Cabral Margarida, Graça Santos Luís, Pernencar Sidarth, Filipe Carvalho João, Morais João
Unidade Local de Saúde da Região de Leiria, E.P.E., 2410-197 Leiria, Portugal.
ciTechCare-Center for Innovative Care and Health Technology, Polytechnique of Leiria, 2411-901 Leiria, Portugal.
Biomedicines. 2025 Sep 9;13(9):2212. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines13092212.
Current guidelines do not specifically address the use of P2Y12 inhibitor (P2Y12i) pretreatment in patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome (NSTE-ACS) who are expected to undergo a late invasive strategy. Nevertheless, such pretreatment may be considered in patients without a high bleeding risk (Class of Recommendation, IIb; Level of Evidence, C). Despite this ambiguity, P2Y12i pretreatment remains a common clinical practice. The present study aimed to evaluate the in-hospital prognostic impact of P2Y12i treatment prior to coronary angiography (CAG) in NSTE-ACS patients undergoing a late invasive strategy (CAG > 24 h after hospital admission). A retrospective analysis was conducted on NSTE-ACS patients undergoing a late invasive strategy included in the Portuguese Registry on Acute Coronary Syndromes between 2010 and 2023. The primary endpoint was a composite of in-hospital events, including all-cause mortality, non-fatal re-infarction, non-fatal stroke, and heart failure (HF). Secondary endpoints included the individual components of the primary endpoint and major bleeding (BARC types 3 and 4). A total of 3776 patients were included (mean age, 66 ± 12 yrs; 29% female), of whom 1530 (41%) received P2Y12i pretreatment (group 1). Group 1 had a lower prevalence of prior myocardial infarction (16% vs. 21%) and prior percutaneous coronary intervention (12% vs. 15%) (both ≤ 0.001). Although obstructive coronary artery disease was more frequent in group 1 (84% vs. 77%, < 0.001), the presence of multivessel disease did not differ (52% vs. 52%, = 0.667). Considering in-hospital antithrombotic therapy, group 1 had higher prescriptions of clopidogrel (68% vs. 56%), aspirin (99% vs. 81%), unfractionated heparin (21% vs. 8%), and enoxaparin (80% vs. 56%) (all < 0.001). There was no significant difference in the primary composite endpoint between groups (9% vs. 9%, = 0.906). Similarly, the secondary endpoints of all-cause mortality (0.6% vs. 0.7%), re-infarction (1.3% vs. 0.7%), stroke (0.7% vs. 0.4%), and HF (7% vs. 8%) did not differ significantly between groups (all > 0.05). Nevertheless, group 1 exhibited higher rates of major bleeding (0.8 vs. 0.2%, OR 3.48, CI 95% 1.22-9.89, = 0.013). Pretreatment with a P2Y12i in NSTE-ACS patients undergoing a late invasive strategy was not associated with reduction in the primary endpoint, although it was associated with higher rates of major bleeding.
当前指南并未专门针对预期将接受延迟侵入性策略的非ST段抬高型急性冠状动脉综合征(NSTE-ACS)患者使用P2Y12抑制剂(P2Y12i)进行预处理的情况。然而,对于出血风险不高的患者,可以考虑进行这种预处理(推荐等级:IIb;证据水平:C)。尽管存在这种不确定性,但P2Y12i预处理仍是一种常见的临床实践。本研究旨在评估在接受延迟侵入性策略(入院后24小时以上进行冠状动脉造影(CAG))的NSTE-ACS患者中,冠状动脉造影(CAG)前使用P2Y12i治疗对住院期间预后的影响。对2010年至2023年期间纳入葡萄牙急性冠状动脉综合征注册研究的接受延迟侵入性策略的NSTE-ACS患者进行了回顾性分析。主要终点是住院期间事件的综合指标,包括全因死亡率、非致命性再梗死、非致命性中风和心力衰竭(HF)。次要终点包括主要终点的各个组成部分以及大出血(BARC 3型和4型)。共纳入3776例患者(平均年龄66±12岁;29%为女性),其中1530例(41%)接受了P2Y12i预处理(第1组)。第1组既往心肌梗死的患病率较低(16%对21%),既往经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的患病率也较低(12%对15%)(均≤0.001)。尽管第1组中阻塞性冠状动脉疾病更为常见(84%对77%,<0.001),但多支血管病变的发生率没有差异(52%对52%,=0.667)。考虑到住院期间的抗栓治疗,第1组氯吡格雷(68%对56%)、阿司匹林(99%对81%)、普通肝素(21%对8%)和依诺肝素(80%对56%)的处方率更高(均<0.001)。两组之间的主要复合终点没有显著差异(9%对9%,=0.906)。同样,全因死亡率(0.6%对0.7%)、再梗死(1.3%对0.7%)、中风(0.7%对0.4%)和HF(7%对8%)等次要终点在两组之间也没有显著差异(均>0.05)。然而,第1组的大出血发生率更高(0.8%对0.2%,OR 3.48,95%CI 1.22-9.89,=0.013)。在接受延迟侵入性策略的NSTE-ACS患者中,P2Y12i预处理与主要终点的降低无关,尽管它与更高的大出血发生率相关。