Nicolò Eleonora, Reduzzi Carolina, Pierga Jean-Yves, Gazzaniga Paola, Stoecklein Nikolas H, Denninghoff Valeria, Rothwell Dominic G, De Bono Johann S, Marchetti Dario, Lianidou Evi, Riethdorf Sabine, Generali Daniele, Hofman Paul, Gerratana Lorenzo, Kuhn Peter, Thiery Jean Paul, Ignatiadis Michail, Bidard Francois-Clement, Lucci Anthony, Kasimir-Bauer Sabine, Serrano Maria Jose, Cristofanilli Massimo
Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology-Oncology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA.
Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology-Oncology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA.
Eur J Cancer. 2025 Dec 9;231:116050. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2025.116050. Epub 2025 Oct 20.
Circulating tumor cells (CTCs) are a versatile biomarker in solid tumors. Extensive research supports their clinical relevance and led to regulatory approval in breast, prostate, and colorectal cancers. However, clinical adoption remains limited mainly due to the lack of consensus and standardized technologies. Additionally, CTC research lacks unified direction. To address these gaps, an international expert panel was established to assess the current and future clinical utility of CTCs.
A panel of 11 CTC experts identified key areas of controversy, informing a structured survey distributed to 55 international multidisciplinary experts. Consensus was predefined as ≥ 70 % agreement. Areas without consensus were discussed in a virtual meeting, leading to final statements on the clinical integration of CTCs.
Thirty-seven experts completed the survey. Consensus was reached on the clinical utility of CTCs for prognosis and treatment monitoring in metastatic breast (BC) and prostate (PC) cancers, including AR-V7 testing in metastatic castration-resistant PC for therapy selection. In other tumors, CTCs remain investigational. Experts agreed that while clinical utility is not yet established in early-stage disease, CTCs show promise in early BC, especially combined with cell-free DNA (cfDNA) for minimal residual disease detection. CellSearch® is currently the only platform with high-level evidence for clinical use, though emerging technologies are promising. Key challenges include improving detection sensitivity/specificity, standardizing workflows, generating robust data, and clinician education. Experts emphasized shifting from enumeration to phenotypic and molecular characterization, particularly for treatment guidance, and highlighted the complementary role of CTCs and cfDNA, advocating for integrated liquid biopsy approaches.
This consensus offers practical guidance for clinical integration of CTCs and outlines strategic research priorities to unlock their full potential in precision oncology.
循环肿瘤细胞(CTCs)是实体瘤中一种多功能生物标志物。广泛的研究支持了它们的临床相关性,并导致其在乳腺癌、前列腺癌和结直肠癌中获得监管批准。然而,临床应用仍然有限,主要原因是缺乏共识和标准化技术。此外,CTCs研究缺乏统一方向。为填补这些空白,成立了一个国际专家小组来评估CTCs的当前和未来临床应用价值。
由11名CTCs专家组成的小组确定了关键争议领域,据此向55名国际多学科专家发放了结构化调查问卷。预先将共识定义为≥70%的一致意见。在虚拟会议上讨论了未达成共识的领域,得出了关于CTCs临床整合的最终声明。
37名专家完成了调查。就CTCs在转移性乳腺癌(BC)和前列腺癌(PC)的预后和治疗监测中的临床应用价值达成了共识,包括在转移性去势抵抗性PC中进行AR-V7检测以选择治疗方案。在其他肿瘤中,CTCs仍处于研究阶段。专家们一致认为,虽然在早期疾病中尚未确立临床应用价值,但CTCs在早期BC中显示出前景,特别是与游离DNA(cfDNA)联合用于检测微小残留病。目前,CellSearch®是唯一具有高水平临床应用证据的平台,尽管新兴技术也很有前景。关键挑战包括提高检测灵敏度/特异性、规范工作流程、生成可靠数据以及对临床医生进行培训。专家们强调应从计数转向表型和分子特征分析,特别是用于治疗指导,并强调了CTCs和cfDNA的互补作用,主张采用综合液体活检方法。
这一共识为CTCs的临床整合提供了实用指导,并概述了战略研究重点,以释放其在精准肿瘤学中的全部潜力。