Suppr超能文献

四种用于钡灌肠肠道准备方法的比较。

A comparison of four methods of bowel preparation for barium enema.

作者信息

Kendrick R G, MacKenzie S, Beckly D E

出版信息

Clin Radiol. 1981 Jan;32(1):95-7. doi: 10.1016/s0009-9260(81)80261-9.

Abstract

A retrospective trial was carried out comparing four methods of bowel preparation on a randomly selected group of 503 patients. The methods of bowel preparations were: (1) X-prep alone, (2) X-prep plus three-day diet, (3) X-prep plus high colonic washout, (4) X-prep plus high colonic washout and three day diet. Faecal content was assessed independently by three radiologists and recorded on a linear analogue scale. Statistically significant differences were shown between the results obtained by each method; 97% of patients prepared by method (4) were acceptable, 89% of method (2), 83% of method (3) and 71% of method (1). It was also found that in-patients exposed to the same method of preparation as out-patients showed inferior bowel cleanliness although not to a statistically significant degree.

摘要

对随机选取的503例患者进行了一项回顾性试验,比较四种肠道准备方法。肠道准备方法如下:(1)单独使用X-prep;(2)X-prep加三天饮食调整;(3)X-prep加高结肠冲洗;(4)X-prep加高结肠冲洗及三天饮食调整。由三名放射科医生独立评估粪便含量,并在线性模拟量表上记录。各方法所得结果之间显示出统计学上的显著差异;采用方法(4)准备的患者中97%可接受,方法(2)为89%,方法(3)为83%,方法(1)为71%。还发现,与门诊患者采用相同准备方法的住院患者,其肠道清洁度较差,尽管未达到统计学显著程度。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验