Suppr超能文献

爱荷华州使用墨尔本多通道人工耳蜗的初步结果。

Initial Iowa results with the multichannel cochlear implant from Melbourne.

作者信息

Tyler R S, Lowder M W, Otto S R, Preece J P, Gantz B J, McCabe B F

出版信息

J Speech Hear Res. 1984 Dec;27(4):596-604. doi: 10.1044/jshr.2704.596.

Abstract

Two subjects who use the Melbourne multichannel cochlear implant were studied. Live-voice word, consonant, and vowel recognition tests, and a speech-tracking task were administered at regular intervals during the first 90 days after implantation. Results indicated 30-50% correct recognition of vowels (given 9 alternatives) and about 30-60% correct recognition of consonants (given 12 alternatives). Speech tracking showed from two to three times faster rates with the implant and vision compared to a vision-alone condition. After 3-4 months of implant experience, a number of recorded tests from the Minimal Auditory Capabilities battery and the Iowa Cochlear-Implant tests were then administered. These results indicated about 80% recognition of everyday sounds in a five-choice closed-set condition and about 50% recognition of everyday sounds in an open-set condition. The subjects were 50% correct at identifying the accented words in a sentence and about 50% correct at determining the number of syllables in a word. One subject was unable to recognize a sentence as a statement or a question. Background noise (+10 dB S/N) reduced their performance on a four-choice spondee test to chance. Both subjects were able to identify a sound as either a voice or a modulated noise at 95% correct, and both could recognize speaker sex at 95% correct. Neither could discriminate whether two (successive) sentences were spoken by the same speaker or by two different speakers. Remarkably, one subject identified 45% and the other 85% of the words in sentences that were preceded by a contextual picture using sound alone. One subject identified 13% of the words in sentences in sound alone even without contextual information.

摘要

对两名使用墨尔本多通道人工耳蜗的受试者进行了研究。在植入后的前90天内定期进行实时语音单词、辅音和元音识别测试以及语音跟踪任务。结果表明,元音识别正确率为30%-50%(提供9个备选答案),辅音识别正确率约为30%-60%(提供12个备选答案)。与仅依靠视觉的情况相比,语音跟踪显示在使用人工耳蜗并结合视觉时速度快两到三倍。在有3-4个月的人工耳蜗使用经验后,接着进行了一些来自最小听觉能力测试组和爱荷华人工耳蜗测试的录音测试。这些结果表明,在五选封闭式条件下,日常声音的识别率约为80%,在开放式条件下约为50%。受试者在识别句子中的重音单词时正确率为一半左右,在确定单词中的音节数量时正确率也约为50%。一名受试者无法分辨一个句子是陈述还是疑问。背景噪音(信噪比为+10分贝)使他们在四选双音节词测试中的表现降至随机水平。两名受试者都能以95%的正确率将一种声音识别为语音或调制噪声,并且都能以95%的正确率识别说话者的性别。两人都无法辨别两个(连续的)句子是由同一个说话者还是由两个不同的说话者说出的。值得注意的是,一名受试者仅通过声音就识别出了在上下文图片之前的句子中45%的单词,另一名受试者识别出了85%。即使没有上下文信息,一名受试者仅通过声音也识别出了句子中13%的单词。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验