Suppr超能文献

在需要进行下肢动脉流出道重建的患者中,大隐静脉是否应该保留?

Should the greater saphenous vein be preserved in patients requiring arterial outflow reconstruction in the lower extremity?

作者信息

Houser S L, Hashmi F H, Jaeger V J, Chawla S K, Brown L, Kemler R L

出版信息

Surgery. 1984 Apr;95(4):467-72.

PMID:6608800
Abstract

Two patient groups were studied to determine the need to preserve the greater saphenous vein during femoral outflow reconstruction for later aortocoronary bypass procedures. First, 74 patients were followed to the time of death or to a minimum of 5 years after femoral outflow reconstruction was performed. Only four patients (5.4%) underwent subsequent aortocoronary bypass. The previous outflow procedures had no adverse effect on the quality of aortocoronary conduit. Risk factors were analyzed to help predict the incidence of later coronary revascularization after femoral outflow reconstruction was performed. The second group that was analyzed included 500 nearly consecutive patients who underwent aortocoronary bypass. In 15 of these patients (3%), there was inadequate saphenous vein for conduit use. In no case was the inadequacy of saphenous vein due to its previous use as outflow conduit in the leg. Only seven patients (1.4%) had had an outflow reconstruction prior to aortocoronary bypass. In conclusion, continued use of adequate greater saphenous vein as femoral outflow conduit is justified despite the high incidence of coronary artery disease in these patients.

摘要

对两组患者进行了研究,以确定在股动脉流出道重建术中保留大隐静脉以备日后进行主动脉冠状动脉搭桥手术的必要性。首先,对74例患者进行随访,直至死亡或股动脉流出道重建术后至少5年。只有4例患者(5.4%)随后接受了主动脉冠状动脉搭桥手术。先前的流出道手术对主动脉冠状动脉移植血管的质量没有不良影响。分析了风险因素,以帮助预测股动脉流出道重建术后后期冠状动脉血运重建的发生率。分析的第二组包括500例几乎连续接受主动脉冠状动脉搭桥手术的患者。在这些患者中有15例(3%),没有足够的大隐静脉用于制作移植血管。大隐静脉不足的情况在任何病例中都不是由于其先前在腿部用作流出道导管所致。只有7例患者(1.4%)在进行主动脉冠状动脉搭桥手术之前进行了流出道重建。总之,尽管这些患者中冠状动脉疾病的发生率很高,但继续使用足够的大隐静脉作为股动脉流出道导管是合理的。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验