Force T, Bloomfield P, O'Boyle J E, Khuri S F, Josa M, Parisi A F
Circulation. 1984 Aug;70(2):233-41. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.70.2.233.
Regional left ventricular wall motion was evaluated by two-dimensional echocardiographic techniques with fixed- and floating-axis analytical algorithms in three groups of subjects: normal subjects (n = 15), patients undergoing uncomplicated coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG) (n = 10), and patients suffering perioperative myocardial infarction (n = 27). In patients undergoing uncomplicated CABG, fixed-axis analysis in the apical four-chamber view produced septal hypokinesis indistinguishable from the septal hypokinesis seen in patients with anterior myocardial infarction. In addition, fixed-axis analysis enhanced lateral wall motion so that patients with lateral myocardial infarction were classified as normal. Floating-axis analysis corrected these limitations by (1) producing regional left ventricular wall motion in the patients undergoing uncomplicated CABG, which was identical to that in normal subjects, and (2) producing regional left ventricular wall motion in patients with myocardial infarction that was hypokinetic in segments corresponding to the electrocardiographic area of involvement. In patients with new Q waves, fixed-axis analysis detected abnormalities of regional left ventricular wall motion in 24 of 34 (71%) electrocardiographically involved regions but also classified 44 of 100 segments in uncomplicated patients as abnormal. Floating-axis analysis detected regional left ventricular wall motion abnormalities in 30 of 34 patients (88%; p less than .05 vs fixed-axis analysis) and only 15 of 100 segments in patients undergoing uncomplicated CABG were classified as abnormal (p less than .001 vs fixed-axis analysis). We conclude that floating-axis analysis is a more accurate and clinically relevant method of evaluating regional left ventricular wall motion in patients undergoing CABG who suffer myocardial infarction as a perioperative complication.
采用二维超声心动图技术,运用固定轴和浮动轴分析算法,对三组受试者的左心室壁区域运动进行评估:正常受试者(n = 15)、接受非复杂性冠状动脉搭桥手术(CABG)的患者(n = 10)以及围手术期心肌梗死患者(n = 27)。在接受非复杂性CABG的患者中,心尖四腔视图的固定轴分析产生的室间隔运动减弱与前壁心肌梗死患者所见的室间隔运动减弱难以区分。此外,固定轴分析增强了侧壁运动,以至于侧壁心肌梗死患者被归类为正常。浮动轴分析通过以下方式纠正了这些局限性:(1)在接受非复杂性CABG的患者中产生与正常受试者相同的左心室壁区域运动;(2)在心肌梗死患者中产生与心电图受累区域相对应节段运动减弱的左心室壁区域运动。在出现新Q波的患者中,固定轴分析在34个心电图受累区域中的24个(71%)检测到左心室壁区域运动异常,但也将100个节段中的44个在非复杂性患者中归类为异常。浮动轴分析在34例患者中的30例(88%;与固定轴分析相比,p<0.05)检测到左心室壁区域运动异常,并且在接受非复杂性CABG的患者中,100个节段中只有15个被归类为异常(与固定轴分析相比,p<0.001)。我们得出结论,对于作为围手术期并发症发生心肌梗死的CABG患者,浮动轴分析是评估左心室壁区域运动更准确且与临床相关的方法。