Suppr超能文献

多项选择投射测验中精神病的模拟

Simulation of psychosis on a multiple-choice projective test.

作者信息

Pettigrew C G, Tuma J M, Pickering J W, Whelton J

出版信息

Percept Mot Skills. 1983 Oct;57(2):463-9. doi: 10.2466/pms.1983.57.2.463.

Abstract

The ability of a new multiple-choice group Rorschach instrument to differentiate 62 undergraduate students asked to simulate psychosis from 75 students and 55 schizophrenics given standard instructions was investigated. For each of 50 responses to miniature inkblots, normals and psychotics chose one of four alternative answers as most descriptive of what the stimulus looked like. Simulators responded as they thought a psychotic or insane person would. As hypothesized, simulators chose significantly more "good form but bizarre wording" responses than normals or psychotics, suggesting that the test is promising as a practical clinical indicator of attempts to simulate psychosis.

摘要

研究了一种新的多项选择式团体罗夏测验工具区分62名被要求模拟精神病的本科生与75名正常学生以及55名按照标准指导语作答的精神分裂症患者的能力。对于50张微型墨迹图的每一张,正常人和模拟精神病患者从四个备选答案中选择一个最能描述刺激物外观的答案。模拟者的回答方式是他们认为精神病患者或疯子会采用的方式。正如所假设的那样,模拟者选择的“形式良好但措辞怪异”的回答显著多于正常人和精神病患者,这表明该测试有望成为模拟精神病尝试的一种实用临床指标。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验