Alboni P, Filippi L, Pirani R, Tomasi A M, Candini G C, Masoni A
Int J Cardiol. 1983 Nov-Dec;4(4):431-42. doi: 10.1016/0167-5273(83)90193-6.
We investigated the reproducibility of sinus node cycle length (SCL), corrected sinus node recovery time (CSRT) and sino-atrial conduction time (SACT) during the control state and following autonomic blockade in 25 patients (mean age: 56.9 +/- 13.8 years). Autonomic blockade was induced by i.v. administration of propranolol (0.2 mg/kg) and atropine (0.04 mg/kg). The electrophysiological study was repeated after 24 hr and the results were compared. The patients were divided into two groups: Group 1 (15) with normal and Group 2 (10) with abnormal intrinsic sinus node function. Following autonomic blockade in Group 1 the daily variations in SCL, CSRT and SACT were very slight whereas in Group 2 there was far greater variability in these parameters. However, in the latter group there were no patients who changed their status from prolonged to normal intrinsic CSRT on the second study, whereas SACT changed its status in 2 patients. In Group 1 the daily variations in sinus node parameters were much slighter following autonomic blockade than during the control state. In Group 2 the variations were very similar during control and following autonomic blockade. These data suggest that: (1) following autonomic blockade the reproducibility of sinus node parameters is very good in Group 1, whereas in Group 2 several patients show marked daily variations in sinus node parameters; (2) following autonomic blockade the sinus node electrophysiological parameters are meaningful in diagnosing an involvement of intrinsic sinus node function; and (3) in patients with abnormal sinus node parameters during control state, but with normal intrinsic sinus node function, the daily variations are mainly due to change in autonomic tone, whereas when the intrinsic sinus node function is abnormal, the day to day variations during control state appear due predominantly to intrinsic sinus node abnormalities.
我们研究了25例患者(平均年龄:56.9±13.8岁)在对照状态下以及自主神经阻滞前后窦房结周期长度(SCL)、校正窦房结恢复时间(CSRT)和窦房传导时间(SACT)的可重复性。通过静脉注射普萘洛尔(0.2mg/kg)和阿托品(0.04mg/kg)诱导自主神经阻滞。24小时后重复进行电生理研究并比较结果。患者分为两组:第1组(15例)窦房结固有功能正常,第2组(10例)窦房结固有功能异常。第1组自主神经阻滞后,SCL、CSRT和SACT的每日变化非常轻微,而第2组这些参数的变异性则大得多。然而,在后一组中,第二次研究时没有患者从固有CSRT延长转变为正常状态,而2例患者的SACT改变了状态。第1组自主神经阻滞后窦房结参数的每日变化比对照状态下要小得多。第2组对照期间和自主神经阻滞后的变化非常相似。这些数据表明:(1)自主神经阻滞后,第1组窦房结参数的可重复性非常好,而第2组有几名患者窦房结参数出现明显的每日变化;(2)自主神经阻滞后,窦房结电生理参数对诊断窦房结固有功能受累有意义;(3)在对照状态下窦房结参数异常但窦房结固有功能正常的患者中,每日变化主要是由于自主神经张力的改变,而当窦房结固有功能异常时,对照状态下的每日变化主要是由于窦房结固有异常所致。