Suppr超能文献

对急救医疗技术人员使用手动通气设备能力的评估。

An evaluation of emergency medical technicians' ability to use manual ventilation devices.

作者信息

Elling R, Politis J

出版信息

Ann Emerg Med. 1983 Dec;12(12):765-8. doi: 10.1016/s0196-0644(83)80254-6.

Abstract

Three hundred twenty emergency medical technicians (EMTs) were tested for their ability to ventilate a precalibrated Recording Resusci-Annie (Laerdal Medical Corporation) using both a bag-valve-mask and a pocket mask. More than 50% of the EMTs were not capable of ventilating to the minimum standard using a bag-valve-mask. The study demonstrates that the pocket mask method is far superior to the bag-valve-mask method. If these experimental results are confirmed by clinical findings, we recommend that future educational courses teach the bag-valve-mask as a four-hand/two-person skill, with one rescuer squeezing the bag with both hands and the second rescuer maintaining hyperextension.

摘要

对320名急救医疗技术员(EMT)使用袋阀面罩和便携面罩为预先校准的复苏安妮(Laerdal医疗公司)进行通气的能力进行了测试。超过50%的急救医疗技术员无法使用袋阀面罩通气至最低标准。该研究表明,便携面罩方法远优于袋阀面罩方法。如果这些实验结果得到临床发现的证实,我们建议未来的培训课程将袋阀面罩作为一种四手/两人操作技能来教授,即一名救援人员用双手挤压袋子,第二名救援人员保持头部过度伸展。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验