Suppr超能文献

[Comparative vision tests using objective and subjective testing methods in amblyopia].

作者信息

Stangler-Zuschrott E, Kulnig W

出版信息

Klin Monbl Augenheilkd. 1983 Dec;183(6):459-63. doi: 10.1055/s-2008-1054983.

Abstract

In 20 amblyopic eyes without reading ability a comparison was made between the visual acuity found by subjective tests and with the Catford Visual Acuity Apparatus, Kotowski's Visumeter and Lotmar's Moiré Visometer. These instruments all work on the basis of different physiological functions. The Kotowski Visumeter seems to be the best instrument for an expertise on the visual acuity of an amblyopic eye. With the test pattern moving from nasal to temporal the results corresponded to the patients reading ability in 16 cases (80%); 4 patients had poorer vision. With the checkerboard pattern moving temporonasally the average results were better than the patients' actual vision. The Catford apparatus gave results corresponding to the subjective reading test only in 12 cases (60%). Apparatus with interferometric scales are not suitable for objective visual testing of amblyopic subjects; the results they give are always much better than the actual vision of the patient.

摘要

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验